To: fontoon
We should have only fired nerf balls at the terrorists.
9 posted on
11/15/2005 4:59:43 PM PST by
Travis McGee
(--- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com ---)
To: Travis McGee
When I was in the Army, I was taught that you're not supposed to use WP on personnel, but you could on equipment. Technically WP is against the Hague Conventions on war if used on people, just like other incendiary devices.
21 posted on
11/15/2005 5:02:40 PM PST by
GAB-1955
(The U.S. Coast Guard -- Shooting at Frenchmen since 1790!)
To: Travis McGee
No, that would be spit balls... per Zell.
32 posted on
11/15/2005 5:05:22 PM PST by
hobson
To: Travis McGee
To: Travis McGee
"We should have only fired nerf balls at the terrorists."
Spitballs. What is wrong with these people? Do they hate the U.S. and admire our adversaries? That's not a rhetorical question.
To: Travis McGee
I was thinking maybe tossing cotton candy.
How terrible - using a substance that burns, explodes and causes damage and death. How cruel.
To: Travis McGee
"We should have only fired nerf balls at the terrorists."
Please, I am certain that you meant to say spitballs.
81 posted on
11/15/2005 6:13:00 PM PST by
Radix
(Wishful Thinking: A Tag Line Field which actually contains enough places to complete a serious thou)
To: Travis McGee
We should have only fired nerf balls at the terrorists.Oh cruel! Krewel!! Nerf balls might hit someone's eye.
91 posted on
11/15/2005 6:33:39 PM PST by
Ole Okie
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
