Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 11/14/2005 7:39:21 PM PST by Carl/NewsMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: Carl/NewsMax

Yeah, Stephie, you are about as believable as your old boss...


2 posted on 11/14/2005 7:40:53 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Woody wood pecker sure ought to know about "lies"!!!!


3 posted on 11/14/2005 7:40:55 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1521649/posts
Tim Russert - Democrat Shill

Another example of misleading the American public..Russert deliberately misled..


4 posted on 11/14/2005 7:42:46 PM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

They're all setting up impeachment proceedings lately, it is so obvious. Why did it take Republicans so long to respond to such serious and erroneous charges...quite a mystery. But it all will go nowhere ultimately.


5 posted on 11/14/2005 7:44:03 PM PST by BonnieJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Stephie... do not you have a cocktail party to attend?


6 posted on 11/14/2005 7:44:20 PM PST by Trajan88 (www.bullittclub.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Who cares what that punk Stephanopoulos thinks?


7 posted on 11/14/2005 7:45:01 PM PST by THX 1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

And Bush has always had a history of being able to manipulate France and Russia -- they saw the same data and came to the same conclusions.


8 posted on 11/14/2005 7:45:13 PM PST by andie74 (A charter member of "Italians for Alito")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Here's Clinton on July 22, 2003, on Larry King Live: "When I left office, there was a substantial amount of biological and chemical material unaccounted for." And in October 2003, some six months after the war ended, Portuguese prime minister Jose Manuel Durao Barroso discussed WMD with Clinton. Said Barroso: "When Clinton was here recently he told me he was absolutely convinced, given his years in the White House and the access to privileged information which he had, that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction until the end of the Saddam regime."
9 posted on 11/14/2005 7:45:32 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

The Dems must really feel threatened by the President's new counterattack. The little Stephie bitch sounds worried.


10 posted on 11/14/2005 7:45:53 PM PST by ExpatGator (Progressivism: A polyp on the colon politic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Where is your evidence ass&^%$!!!????

The scummy libs are great at false accusations, WITH NO EVIDENCE!!! Let's see it you little maggot!


11 posted on 11/14/2005 7:46:09 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

When did this guy become and expert on lying presidents?


12 posted on 11/14/2005 7:46:19 PM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
"The two men who led post-invasion WMD search teams, however, tend to side with the Bush White House on Saddam's nuclear threat."

To Clinton's pet Georgie-boy [pitiful excuse for a "journalist"]: Gee, and do you think Kay and Duelfer might know a little bit more about Saddam's efforts on the nuclear front than you, little Miss Prissy George Stephanopoulos, Bill Clinton's favorite man-child????? Earth to little Georgie-boy: the last time we'd had to deal with Saddam in a big way, in 1991, it turned out that he was far CLOSER to having nuclear weapons than virtually any of the intel in the west had suggested. Estimates after the first Gulf War were that Saddam had come within 12 months or less of having his first nuclear warhead(s) without anyone in the western intel agencies being the wiser. Soooo, in the face of lots of evidence that Saddam was unwilling to truly relinquish his WMD programs, it was a great deal more within 'reason' (that you know nothing about Georgie-boy) to err on the side of caution when assessing the intel picture with Saddam.
13 posted on 11/14/2005 7:46:37 PM PST by Enchante (Joe Wilson: "I don't know anything about uranium, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn last night!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

I remember the run up to the invasion.

I remember distinctly that Iraq was not billed as an imminent nuclear threat. Iraq was painted, accurately, as a clear and present danger. Saddam Hussein's determined attempts over the decades to obtain nuclear weapons was given as evidence of the danger he posed. His possession of biological and chemical WMD's was not doubted, though the size of his stockpiles was questioned. His possession of manufacturing capability was also not doubted, and the means to produce chemical and biological weapons have been found in Iraq. Most of that equipment is dual purpose, but civilian purpose machinery is never scrubbed down to deny any investigative entity to determine its past history of use. The media, more than anybody else, latched onto the nuclear threat and advanced that idea relentlessly.

In other words, the media advanced and promoted the nuclear threat, and purposefully exaggerated the threat. Now they blame the Bush Administration for misleading them and the American people.


14 posted on 11/14/2005 7:47:54 PM PST by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
From what I've seen the last 48 hours from C-Span, the MSM, to minions in both halls of congress it seems the dems have unleashed a new talking points campaign to the likes we haven't seen since the election fiasco in 2000.
17 posted on 11/14/2005 7:50:38 PM PST by quantim (Just be glad Detroit is not in a hurricane zone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax; devolve; potlatch; ntnychik; Grampa Dave; BOBTHENAILER
Staphlococcus can't handle anything more techno than a blow dryer.

Speaking of lies, how about, "Not a single nuclear missile is targeting our children as they sleep in their beds tonight."

That would be Staphlo's godfather, who supplied the ChiComs with the MIRV technology via the 200-page fax of Mssrs. Schwartz and Armstrong, megadonors of El Bento.

Just in: Sandy Berger, formerly Beijing's butt boy at Hogan and Hartson, still not doing his time for the National Archive heist.

Coming up on five years of the new tone and it's going to result in yet more slander, more treason, and a probable impeachment.

Note to WH: butch it up in there.

19 posted on 11/14/2005 7:51:23 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Just another passive "news" person hosting a major network show. Bias, gee, what bias. Old that old saw? That's just a figment of a conservative mind.


20 posted on 11/14/2005 7:52:38 PM PST by Obadiah ( Deuteronomy 6:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Stephanopoulos : in another language means Fudgepacker !


22 posted on 11/14/2005 7:53:15 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
"I hate to use that word lying,"

Sure you do...

24 posted on 11/14/2005 7:59:42 PM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All
Now I understand why retired San Francisco talk show host Jim Eason called him George Step in awful stuff.

(Jim was the first to call for the impeachment of Clinton. He did it on Jan. 20th, 1993, it may have been the next day but I think that it was the 20th.)

26 posted on 11/14/2005 8:01:52 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (Hillary is the she in shenanigans.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

So Stephanapoulos has decided to join the great Democrat lying machine? Or did he ever leave?


27 posted on 11/14/2005 8:19:51 PM PST by popdonnelly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson