Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Structural deficit still haunts California
Fresno Bee ^ | 11-14-2005 | Dan Walters

Posted on 11/14/2005 4:08:54 PM PST by Amerigomag

When California voters rejected, by a 3-to-2 margin, Gov. Schwarzenegger's budget- reform measure last week, it left the fiscal status quo intact — and that means that the state's deficit-ridden budget continues to gush red ink.California is still obligated by either law or political mandate to spend roughly 5% to 7% more than its revenue system can produce, even during a prosperous economy.

The Legislature's independent budget office has estimated that the state would need to spend $94 billion in 2005-06 to cover the obligations of current law, but that revenues are forecast at about $88 billion. Those numbers will change, because the state is experiencing better-than-expected revenue growth this year. Even a surge of revenues is a mixed blessing, because a law governing school finance probably will require it to spend more as it receives more. The convoluted law was a touchstone for this year's ballot measure battle.

In the short term, Schwarzenegger and legislators might produce a "balanced" budget next year by counting on improved state revenues and then using the last $3 billion of a bond issue that voters approved last year to cover budget gaps. But that wouldn't do anything about the structural deficit that haunts California as a symbol of its governmental dysfunction ... Democrats refuse major spending cuts and Republicans refuse tax increases.

(Excerpt) Read more at fresnobee.com ...


TOPICS: US: California
KEYWORDS: calbondage; calbudget; california; structuraldeficit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
It just keeps on going ...and going ...and going.
1 posted on 11/14/2005 4:08:54 PM PST by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

I would think if the good citizens of California want to spent 8% more than revenues they ought get their ass an income tax increase soon.

Or kiss their bond ratings goodbye...again.


2 posted on 11/14/2005 4:17:20 PM PST by mmercier (give the people what they want)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mmercier

spent = spend

sorry.


3 posted on 11/14/2005 4:18:19 PM PST by mmercier (give the people what they want)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

The voters don't care if CA goes down the tubes. They are going to milk it dry, and then go home to Mexico.


4 posted on 11/14/2005 4:20:41 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie; SierraWasp; calcowgirl; EveningStar; NormsRevenge; tubebender


5 posted on 11/14/2005 4:24:00 PM PST by FOG724 (http://gravenimagemusic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

They are almost as bad as the Federal Government. Too bad they can't just print some more money.


6 posted on 11/14/2005 4:25:14 PM PST by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Yes, and the tax PAYERS are leaving the state in droves, while the tax USERS keep coming in droves.


7 posted on 11/14/2005 4:28:03 PM PST by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mmercier

Tax the crap out of those elite liberal hollywood actors living in those fabulous mansions. Micheal Moore made a lot of money last year. I'm sure he won't mind paying 99% of it back in taxes. How about Barbra Striesand? Tax them all! hehehe! They demand it. They are the rich after all...


8 posted on 11/14/2005 4:28:43 PM PST by Forte Runningrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
California is still obligated by either law or political mandate to spend roughly 5% to 7% more than its revenue system can produce, even during a prosperous economy.

Let me guess just how much the debt service expense is on the $20 billion Arnold has borrowed.

9 posted on 11/14/2005 4:55:39 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
Voters here love Big Government - as long as they don't have to pay too much for it. They could care less if there's a deficit. All they expect is that services and benefits get delivered on time and there'll be hell to pay if they aren't.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

10 posted on 11/14/2005 4:58:05 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie

Walters always makes the hit on Republicans in his column because they won't raise taxes. However, he states in this article it wouldn't matter if they did because we have "structured" in the over-spending so it would just increase the deficit. Crazy but we Californians own it.


11 posted on 11/14/2005 5:09:20 PM PST by kmiller1k (remain calm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
California is still obligated by either law or political mandate to spend roughly 5% to 7% more than its revenue system can produce, even during a prosperous economy.

Let me guess just how much the debt service expense is on the $20 billion Arnold has borrowed.

CA: State Weighs New Wave of Borrowing, Los Angeles Times, October 4, 2005:

According to the nonpartisan legislative analyst's office, the percentage of the state's budget that goes to pay off debt has reached 6%. Over the next few years even more debts will come due. By 2009, according to the analyst, paying back debt will account for nearly 7% of the state budget.  

12 posted on 11/14/2005 5:30:43 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
So about half of the structural deficit belongs to Arnold.
13 posted on 11/14/2005 5:45:06 PM PST by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag

$380,000/year plus a free house on campus for a UC system dean. Where do I sign up for a job like this ?


14 posted on 11/14/2005 5:52:55 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
"So about half of the structural deficit belongs to Arnold."

Before he's done, he'll own a lot more of it.

15 posted on 11/14/2005 5:53:35 PM PST by Czar (StillFedUptotheTeeth@Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
The not so secret Legislative plan is to force a major restructuring of the tax system in CA. They simply can not fund the welfare state their interest groups want without a major increase in revenues.

First on the list will be a repeal of prop. 13, so the state can tap into all those increasing property values. Legislators in Sacramento now openly state that people want to live here no matter what the tax rates, pointing to the increasing housing values as proof of the demand.

Then, major increases on income taxes and corporate taxes will be rolled out. Gas and registration taxes are probably taboo and will be avoided unless they can be tied directly into road improvements in a way the sheeple" will believe.

They've already written off this Governor, and they will be angling for the biggest spending liberal they can find to sign the whole thing into law. It's gonna be fun. /sar.
16 posted on 11/14/2005 5:59:42 PM PST by Wiseghy (Discontent is the want of self-reliance: it is infirmity of will. – Ralph Waldo Emerson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FOG724

thanks for the ping...


17 posted on 11/14/2005 6:03:07 PM PST by tubebender (Chris Matthews suffers from "IRRATIONAL EXUBERANCE"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

In any other story, it seems that Liberal Californians have no more further obligation or inclination to stop California from being a pile of poo due to their lack of intelligence for their own well being: i. e, not paying their taxes or stopping the immigrants and drugs from getting through Mexico (maybe even Panama) from Downtown America (the Southern one).

So they're stuck no matter how many more complaints they throw at Arnold for their faults. They've become well fond of being rather like the 'Pink Elephant' as opposed to the 'Fat Donkey,' or they are, well, pretty deaf to the public.


18 posted on 11/14/2005 6:27:58 PM PST by KungFuMaster (It may be like a finger pointing at the moon, but it doesn't mean you should look at the *finger*...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KungFuMaster
Most Californians are only concerned about today and to hell with tomorrow. They live four miles beyond their means...
19 posted on 11/14/2005 6:54:17 PM PST by tubebender (Chris Matthews suffers from "IRRATIONAL EXUBERANCE"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
A lot of Californians don't pay taxes. There is such a large under ground economy here in Fresno. The illegals take all the state and federal benefits, enjoy the state infrastructure and never pay a dime. If you don't pay taxes you really don't need to worry about politics.
20 posted on 11/14/2005 7:29:04 PM PST by pterional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson