Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zerosix

Hmmm I wonder where the evos are on this one, they attack everything about the KBOE standards, they cant show up and refute him?


5 posted on 11/14/2005 8:18:52 AM PST by aft_lizard (I need a new tagline since Miers is done for, any help would be appreciated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: aft_lizard

> I wonder where the evos are on this one

What, you can't wait six posts? Sheesh.


6 posted on 11/14/2005 8:22:38 AM PST by orionblamblam ("You're the poster boy for what ID would turn out if it were taught in our schools." VadeRetro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard

Oh, they are alive and working hard and places like the Kansas City Star, (smaller rags such as the Johnson County Sun Newspapers) each and every local television station manager, the KS Governor's Office, the KS House of Represenataives and Senate, the Kansas National Education Association and many umbrella sham organizations run under them, the University of Kansas, Kansas State University, etc.


8 posted on 11/14/2005 8:24:39 AM PST by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard
Hmmm I wonder where the evos are on this one ===> Placemarker <===
9 posted on 11/14/2005 8:24:58 AM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard

Here's one.

Let's look at that "harmless" science standard.

"Science is a systematic method of continuing investigation that uses observations, hypothesis testing, measurement, experimentation, logical argument and theory building to lead to more adequate explanations of natural phenomena."

...."more adequate... is not the same as scientific and leaves the door open to supernatural explanations.

That's what's wrong.


29 posted on 11/14/2005 8:44:40 AM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard

Here I am again.

Note the following from the article:

"The critics also claim that in the scientific community, there is no controversy about evolution. They then proceed to explain that I ought to understand something about this, because surely I can see that over a period of time, over many generations, a pair of dogs will "evolve". There is a high likelihood that the progeny several generations down the line will not look like the original pair of dogs. And then some of the critics will claim that this proves that all living creatures came from some original set of cells."

A thoroughly dishonest representation of most scientists' views on evolution and no attribution given.


37 posted on 11/14/2005 8:48:59 AM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: aft_lizard

I'l ba-aack.

Here's another gem:

Obviously, that is one of the reasons that we tried to further define evolution. We want to differentiate between the genetic capacity in each species genome that permits it to change with the environment as being different from changing to some other creature. "

In other words we would like to redefine evolution out of existence and hide behind a flurry of words whilewe do so.


44 posted on 11/14/2005 8:51:57 AM PST by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson