Replies

I guarantee you any aircraft designed with strict adherence to these faulty scientific concepts (in the theory of flight) would not fly, so they were not. Yet this theory of flight was stated as absolute as the theory of gravity for many years.

If this theory of flight was so absolute for so many years, how come all the planes could fly. This is another of your many ignorant distortions based on your scientific ignorance.

The scientific case against powered flight

1. For thousands of years, powered flight has been known to be impossible.
2. If God meant man to fly, He'd have given us wings.
3. There is no evidence of powered flight. None at all.
4. Those who claim to have flown are liars, in it for the money.
5. Things seen in the sky other than birds are, in truth, evidence of supernatural beings.
6. The Second Law of Thermodynamics rules out heavier-than-air flight.
7. Powered flight upsets the natural order, and leads to sexual promiscuity.
8. Powered flight is not mentioned in the Bible.
9. Lord Kelvin (1824-1907), a highly regarded scientist and president of the Royal Society of London, stated flatly in 1885, "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible."
10. It takes more faith to believe in powered flight than to believe in the tooth fairy. Teach the controversy!

I have the answer, but I want to wait and see what your answer is. If your are what you say you are, then you already know. If your only answer is what you said here after your 2 hypothetical questions, then it is nothing. In fact your questions may reveal already, but I will wait for you.

See thats part of it, lets try to have a real dialog here. Or are you a scientist or not?

Wolf