Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WildTurkey


The scientific case against powered flight

1. For thousands of years, powered flight has been known to be impossible.
2. If God meant man to fly, He'd have given us wings.
3. There is no evidence of powered flight. None at all.
4. Those who claim to have flown are liars, in it for the money.
5. Things seen in the sky other than birds are, in truth, evidence of supernatural beings.
6. The Second Law of Thermodynamics rules out heavier-than-air flight.
7. Powered flight upsets the natural order, and leads to sexual promiscuity.
8. Powered flight is not mentioned in the Bible.
9. Lord Kelvin (1824-1907), a highly regarded scientist and president of the Royal Society of London, stated flatly in 1885, "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible."
10. It takes more faith to believe in powered flight than to believe in the tooth fairy. Teach the controversy!

186 posted on 11/14/2005 6:01:50 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Expect no response if you're a troll, lunatic, retard, or incurable ignoramus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies ]


To: PatrickHenry
9. Lord Kelvin (1824-1907), a highly regarded scientist and president of the Royal Society of London, stated flatly in 1885, "Heavier-than-air flying machines are impossible."

You have to wonder if anyone asked Kelvin about birds and insects.

187 posted on 11/14/2005 6:29:11 PM PST by VadeRetro (Liberalism is a cancer on society. Creationism is a cancer on conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

Lord Kelvin also said "Radio has no future" which turned out to be utter nonsense. However, he also said "When you can measure what you are speaking about, and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge of it is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind; it may be the beginning of knowledge, but you have scarcely, in your thoughts, advanced it to the stage of science."


188 posted on 11/14/2005 6:35:53 PM PST by Liberal Classic (No better friend, no worse enemy. Semper Fi.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke formulated the following three laws:

Clarke's Law, later the first of the three laws, was proposed by Arthur C. Clarke in the essay "Hazards of Prophecy: The Failure of Imagination", in Profiles of the Future (1962). The second law is offered as a simple observation in the same essay; its status as Clarke's Second Law was conferred on it by others.

In a revised edition of Profiles of the Future (1973), Clarke acknowledged the Second Law and proposed the Third in order to round out the numbers, adding "As three laws were good enough for Newton, I have modestly decided to stop there."

189 posted on 11/14/2005 6:36:13 PM PST by Coyoteman (I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry
7. Powered flight upsets the natural order, and leads to sexual promiscuity.

Ahhh; that would explain the "Hot Nympho Stewardess" erotic film genre...

192 posted on 11/14/2005 7:47:06 PM PST by longshadow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

To: PatrickHenry

"8. Powered flight is not mentioned in the Bible."

Well, except for Elijah(sp? -- there's two and get the spellings mixed up) episode with the Chariot of Fire.


210 posted on 11/15/2005 7:36:40 AM PST by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson