Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boomers Aren't Going Anywhere
San Diego Union-Tribune ^ | November 13, 2005 | Ruben Navarrette Jr.

Posted on 11/13/2005 5:45:33 PM PST by RWR8189

SAN DIEGO -- People are busy talking about what this country is going to look like in a few years when a cohort of 78 million Americans acquire a title they never wanted: senior citizen. Hippies who turned into yuppies are about to turn into golden oldies. Just what I wanted to hear: more about the baby boomers.

USA Today recently wrapped up a series on aging in America that touched on everything from life expectancy to saving for retirement to long-term health care issues.

The newspaper insists that by the year 2046 -- when those Americans who were born from 1946 to 1964 are between 82 and 100 years old -- it'll be a boomer's world. As far as boomers are concerned, the future promises to be, well, to use one of their words, groovy.

The way the article paints it: ``Thanks to lifestyle habits and medical advances, they probably will be the healthiest group of elderly in history. Thanks to extended employment spans, they will be the wealthiest. Thanks to their huge voting bloc, they will be the most powerful.'' So basically the boomers will have their health, plenty of cash, and lots of political clout to get their way.

And the point is? That's how it is now. Americans can't make it through a presidential election without rehashing the Vietnam War. The phenomenon began when the nation's first boomer president, Bill Clinton, was accused by some of dodging the draft to avoid going to Vietnam. The phenomenon reached ridiculous new heights in the 2004 election with the emphasis on Swift boat veterans and George W. Bush's service in the Texas Air National Guard.

And when Bush started talking up the need to reform Social Security, he framed the issue as a system in crisis because the program wouldn't be there for boomers when they retire. He also tried to head off any criticism from boomers by assuring them that any changes wouldn't affect those who were 55 and older.

Nobody seemed to care much about the financial burden that will almost certainly befall the two generations that follow the boomers -- Generation X (now in its 30s and early 40s) and Generation Y (in its 20s and teens) -- just to keep Social Security afloat. Certainly not the boomers. What they care about is what the future holds for them. And why should that surprise us?

This generation has never been plagued with low self-esteem or the sense that the world didn't revolve around them. This is, after all, the generation that helped deliver on the promise of civil rights for blacks and Hispanics and equal rights for women, that fought and helped end the war in Vietnam, and that helped drive a corrupt president from office. You could stop there, and already have enough to say grace over. Not boomers.

Listen to how Newsweek put it in a cover story this week on the boomers turning 60: ``They and their siblings invented not just the epiphenomena of youth culture -- blue jeans and rock music, sexual permissiveness and political alienation -- but the very idea of youth as a separate realm of experience and knowledge.''

That's a heck of thing to have on your resume, or to break the ice at cocktail parties. ``That's Fred over there. He's a baby boomer. He invented youth. Good for you, Fred!''

But even the egotistical baby boomers can't escape Father Time. And so, the latest product being pitched is retirement planning. Financial services companies are running commercials that rely on lava lamps and images from the 1960s to convince boomers that they really are getting older and approaching retirement age, and that it's time to plan their exit from the work force.

Good luck with that. Boomers don't seem to be in any hurry to leave. This is the generation that doesn't think the rules apply to them, and that includes rules about getting old and retiring. The Newsweek article mentions a retirement survey conducted by Merrill Lynch that found that 81 percent of boomers plan to work past the age of 65.

Expect many boomers to work from home, perhaps log shorter days and weeks, but to keep on working as long as their minds and bodies hold up.

These folks aren't going anywhere. But you knew that.

© 2005, The San Diego Union-Tribune


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: babyboomers; boomers; genx; greedygeezers; retirement; rubennavarrettejr
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last
To: Vision
They'll be in a world of hurt. The Boomers' have destroyed American for too long and a anti-socialist payback's a bitch

Small and empty threats from small and empty people.

41 posted on 11/13/2005 6:24:04 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: qam1

Generation Reagan Bump!


42 posted on 11/13/2005 6:24:58 PM PST by Incorrigible (If I lead, follow me; If I pause, push me; If I retreat, kill me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheik yerbouty

Especially,... coming out of the San Diego newspaper...


43 posted on 11/13/2005 6:25:23 PM PST by Cvengr (<;^))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie

Will it mean red inks are added to Taxachusetts's political map?


44 posted on 11/13/2005 6:25:58 PM PST by NZerFromHK (Alberta independentists to Canada (read: Ontario and Quebec): One hundred years is long enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Aracelis
Ok, you got me

But I'm disheartened over what Boomers have vitriolically done to our country
45 posted on 11/13/2005 6:26:21 PM PST by Vision ("When you trust in yourself, you're trusting in the same wisdom that created you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189
81 percent of boomers plan to work past the age of 65.

Hi, welcome to Wal Mart!
46 posted on 11/13/2005 6:27:18 PM PST by Nachoman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas
Small and empty threats from small and empty people.

You wish grandpa
47 posted on 11/13/2005 6:29:06 PM PST by Vision ("When you trust in yourself, you're trusting in the same wisdom that created you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RWR8189

http://www.rickmcginnis.com/boomer/


48 posted on 11/13/2005 6:29:41 PM PST by caveat emptor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clee1; All
The children of the "Greatest Generation" have just about ruined this Nation.

So now it's très chic to hate the Boomers? What's the matter...Islamo-Fascists and the French aren't scarey enough for you?

49 posted on 11/13/2005 6:31:28 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Vision
You wish grandpa

Actually, I am a grandfather. Is that a problem? Do you think that Free Republic has become a teenage hangout to disrespect adults? I suggest you run that little gem by another prominant boomer on this site, Jim Robinson. Good luck.

50 posted on 11/13/2005 6:32:30 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Vision
You wish grandpa

Actually, I am a grandfather. Is that a problem? Do you think that Free Republic has become a teenage hangout to disrespect adults? I suggest you run that little gem by another prominant boomer on this site, Jim Robinson. Good luck.

51 posted on 11/13/2005 6:32:31 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Appalled but Not Surprised
Earl Warren was born in 1891, Roy Wilkins in 1901, Lyndon Johnson and Hubert Humphrey in 1911, Rosa Parks in 1913, Nicholas Katzenbach in 1922, Malcolm X in 1925, and Martin Luther King in 1929. They were hardly Baby Boomers.
52 posted on 11/13/2005 6:35:47 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Melas
Actually, I am a grandfather. Is that a problem? Do you think that Free Republic has become a teenage hangout to disrespect adults? I suggest you run that little gem by another prominant boomer on this site, Jim Robinson. Good luck.

hehehe
53 posted on 11/13/2005 6:35:56 PM PST by Vision ("When you trust in yourself, you're trusting in the same wisdom that created you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Appalled but Not Surprised

I have served as well. However, I was a bit young for Nam, being a mere 9 years old in March of '73 when the last soldiers pulled out. Grenada happened on my watch, but only the tiniest minority of soldiers and sailors had any direct involvement in that operation.


54 posted on 11/13/2005 6:38:34 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Vision

It's funny that Jim's a boomer now? This just gets better all the time.


55 posted on 11/13/2005 6:39:25 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Vision
But I'm disheartened over what Boomers have vitriolically done to our country

I was born in 1956.

As an evil Boomer, I have voted strictly Conservative, worked almost every day of my life since I was 14 years old, raised two daughters on my own, campaigned heavily amongst my peers for fewer entitlements, and helped care for every aging member of our family in our homes until they died. Currently, I am enrolled in a Ph.D. track program in healthcare so I never have to quit working.

Social Security just informed me that I can expect about $800.00 per month if I retire at age 65. I don't expect even that small amount to be there IF I ever quit working.

Now, please tell me how I can pay society back for the insensitivity of being born in 1956.

56 posted on 11/13/2005 6:39:41 PM PST by Aracelis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

Yeah, I understand why it's done. Just noting the dominance of those commercials these days due to the aging baby boomer populace.


57 posted on 11/13/2005 6:40:52 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Melas

Please buy a clue. I'm talking about the others of his anit-American generation


58 posted on 11/13/2005 6:42:58 PM PST by Vision ("When you trust in yourself, you're trusting in the same wisdom that created you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
actually, if Boomers live up to their infamy, we'll spend it all and nobody gets nuttin.
59 posted on 11/13/2005 6:43:11 PM PST by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Aracelis

Oh, now you know you're not a problematic Boomer


60 posted on 11/13/2005 6:44:16 PM PST by Vision ("When you trust in yourself, you're trusting in the same wisdom that created you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-176 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson