You did not. The rest of your post is irrelevant.
My argument was pretty easy to understand, but being that you reject it so vehemently without expressing a logical reason to, let us take it one little baby step at a time and see where you have a problem with it:
Premise A) There is much more then "one iota" of evidence for the Big Bang theory (albeit not conclusive proof, the evidence could be interpreted a different way).
Any problem so far?