Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LogicWings
There isn't. Present it. My cosmology doesn't need it.

It seems strange that you would want me to present evidence for your own cosmology, particularly when you insist not only that you have none, but that there is none.

For the sake of whatever your argument is, lets say that there is not even one iota of evidence for your cosmology. I am curious to know what you would argue with such a strange premise.

663 posted on 12/03/2005 9:14:46 PM PST by AndyTheBear (Disastrous social experimentation is the opiate of elitist snobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies ]


To: AndyTheBear
The original statement I made in post 91 was:

One "wet iota" (see poet John Ciardi) of evidence for ID. That's all. Just one.

Now you say:

It seems strange that you would want me to present evidence for your own cosmology, particularly when you insist not only that you have none, but that there is none.

My, my you people are dishonest. I never said there is none. I could never assert that, it would require Proving the Negative.

For the sake of whatever your argument is, lets say that there is not even one iota of evidence for your cosmology. I am curious to know what you would argue with such a strange premise.

So for you to turn this on its head say that I am asserting there isn't "one wet iota" for my point of view is laughable.

What I said is precisely the opposite, there isn't one wet iota of evidence for ID and you simply will not admit that fact.

664 posted on 12/04/2005 5:16:11 PM PST by LogicWings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson