To: durasell
"People have burned up thousands of posts on these threads arguing science v. faith."
Well actually they are both based on faith.
349 posted on
11/14/2005 12:09:16 AM PST by
Sun
(Hillary Clinton is pro-ILLEGAL immigration. Don't let her fool you. She has a D- /F immigr. rating.)
To: Sun
Well actually they are both based on faith. Well, no they are not. One is based upon observation, testing, and repeatability. The other is based upon 2500 year-old manuscripts purported to be the Word of God.
But, of course, if you don't know anything about science I can see how it would look like magic.
368 posted on
11/14/2005 3:46:42 AM PST by
Junior
(From now on, I'll stick to science, and leave the hunting alien mutants to the experts!)
To: Sun
Well actually they are both based on faith.Truth, albeit there appears to be vastly more scientific evidentiary support for the ID position.
387 posted on
11/14/2005 7:13:38 AM PST by
Paul Ross
("The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: 'I'm from the govt and I'm here to help)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson