Well, no they are not. One is based upon observation, testing, and repeatability. The other is based upon 2500 year-old manuscripts purported to be the Word of God.
But, of course, if you don't know anything about science I can see how it would look like magic.
Well, well. This is too funny. After all your talk about not answering the "trolls," you are answering all of us.
Looks like we must be EFFECTIVE or you wouldn't bother with us "trolls."
OK, since you are so smart, explain THIS science, supporting Intelligent Design:
http://www.intelligentdesignnetwork.org/NCBQ3_3HarrisCalvert.pdf
Then explain THIS:
Prove that we humans evolved from an "unknown primate".
Columbus was a deeply committed Christian whose own writings prove that his desire to carry the message of Jesus Christ to faraway lands was the primary motivation of his historic voyage to the New World.
http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/columbus/columbus.shtml
Columbus' writings also showed that he knew the world was round from the Bible. Do a search and read where the Bible said the world is round.
And thank goodness, there are more people with common sense than there are scientists with closed minds, stuck in the past:
A new Gallup survey asks the question:
Which of the following statements comes closest to your views on the origin and development of human beings: Human beings have evolved over millions of years from other forms of life and God guided this process; human beings have evolved over millions of years from other forms of life, but God had no part in this process, or God created human beings in their present form exactly the way the Bible describes it?
And the poll results are:
Evolved, God guided: 31%
Evolved, God had no part: 12%
God created exactly as Bible describes it: 53%
http://corner.nationalreview.com/10/13/05 | Byron York, citing Gallup