Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne
I have asked several others on this thread to explain how the first single celled organism came into being. So far that request has gone unanswered. It goes unanswered because nobody knows. There are certain theories, but none are adoptable as the single truth.

Despite the truth that even this cannot be explained, I and our nation's youth are supposed to accept that the ToE is irrefutable.


As has already been explained, the theory of evolution says nothing about how the first single-celled organism came into being. The theory of evolution does not depend on how the first single-celled organism came into being. Claiming that the theory of evolution is in any way in doubt because there is no explanation as to how the first single-celled organism came into being demonstrates that you do not understand the theory of evolution. Either that or you are lying.
234 posted on 11/13/2005 7:08:35 PM PST by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies ]


To: Dimensio
Well there have been a number of your attempting to carry on a dialogue with me.  If I missed a pronouncement to this effect, I'm sorry.

Even the progression of man from singled celled organism is not sustainable.  We have established that you can't prove anything in science.  You do remember that right?

What it all boils down to is that you folks have observed some evolution, and voyola, that's the definitive basis for the origion of man.  Nah.  It may be.  It may not be.  It is not definitive.
239 posted on 11/13/2005 7:16:00 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson