Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Batrachian
What's the right approach? I'm glad you asked. Overturn this "separation of church and state" idiocy, which isn't in the constitution and is the creation of anti-religious liberals

Wow are you joking me???? First Amendment states:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

The establishment clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. Also known as "separation of church and state".

If you ever go to Phila, please... please... please... go to the new Constitution center and educate yourself. Serious...

12 posted on 11/12/2005 8:59:46 AM PST by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: trashcanbred
Why do you choose to ignore "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;?"
20 posted on 11/12/2005 9:31:28 AM PST by Nephi (Conservatives did what moderates/Bushbots wouldn't - we rescued Bush's judicial legacy for him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: trashcanbred

The problem is lots of people think(?) the "free expression"
of religion is the same as "establishing" it!

Soon, exchanging marriage vows with the opposite sex
will be seen as discriminatory "anti-same sex marriage language" and therefore banned (if you follow the same type of idiotic logic)


24 posted on 11/12/2005 9:46:25 AM PST by Getready ((fear not...))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: trashcanbred
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

Right. How is teaching religion in school the same as congress passing a law?

You might as well say that the constitution guarantees a right to privacy and therefore abortion has to be legal. I'll bet that's exactly what you believe. Are you sure you're in the right forum?

28 posted on 11/12/2005 10:04:52 AM PST by Batrachian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: trashcanbred

There is no constituional reason local school boards can't teach what they want. Where is in written in the Constitution that the federal government is in charge of local education? If communities want to have religion classes and no one there complains, what business is it of the federal government?


36 posted on 11/12/2005 11:00:07 AM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: trashcanbred
The establishment clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. Also known as "separation of church and state".

It was never known to have that meaning until 1947 when FDR's communist stacked court ruled that athiesm was the State's official religion.

88 posted on 11/12/2005 8:50:58 PM PST by Rightwing Conspiratr1 (Lock-n-load!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: trashcanbred; Batrachian
The establishment clause prohibits the government from passing legislation to establish an official religion or preferring one religion over another. Also known as "separation of church and state".

Yeah, right.

The crier says, "God save the United States and this honorable court."

92 posted on 11/13/2005 7:33:07 AM PST by AndrewC (Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson