Posted on 11/11/2005 4:39:05 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
The phony-but-accurate defense is back.
Mary Mapes, producer of the notorious Rathergate story in which CBS relied on blatantly forged documents to argue that the young George W. Bush received preferential treatment in the National Guard, just completed an interview on Fox & Friends with ED Hill.
ED was grilling Mapes rather hard as to the standards of authentication that were required to go forward with such an explosive story. Mapes first gave something of a "depends what the meaning of is, is" defense. She claimed that the standard of authentication for her purposes could be lower than that of absolute proof in a legal setting.
Mapes then added: "I relied on the information, not the authentication."
Translation: yeah, the documents could have been phony, but the underlying story was true.
The old false-but-accurate defense rides again!
As an aside, IMO ED Hill could have been tougher in terms of demonstrating how blatant were the forgeries, but other than that I felt ED handled herself in a professional manner.
How ironic the "Bush Lied" crowd would so desperately pin their hopes to this, of all stories, last year. It was, in fact, to paraphrase Teddy the Swimmer, the Left that concocted a story in Texas, based on a lie, for political gain.
Downright surreal, isn't it?
Nope. Faking history is legal.
That's Mary Mape's own definition of the word "is" moment. She acts as if she lives in a world where she can't be touched by legal action, even though she tried to effect the re-election of a sitting president with fabricated documents.
Mapes relied on "selective" information and conveniently ignored information from the family and associates of the Colonel which contradicted the propoganda from Bill Burkett.
Mapes is on WRKO now. BUCKHEAD where are you??? 1-617-266-6868
Savage lucid??????
Surely, you jest
Links to preliminary analyses below ...
Yesterday, someone on this page described CBS as "Plant of the Mapes."
Two broads arguing over what's true is like two vegetarians arguing over a porterhouse steak.
DA740
ROTFLMBO. What if President Bush said this about the military intel before the war? ALL the Rats would scream themselves hoarse.
And the best part is that Bush's intel was a whole lot more accurate and true than the documents from the Rather forgery team.
I think we'll eventually get confirmation on WMDs (Syria) etc. not to mention how much stuff has been found in Iraq that everyone just ignores--including the Bush administration for some reason.
I'll be surprised if her book sells. Even to democrats.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.