Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Political Prosecution of Rush Limbaugh
NewsMax ^ | 11/11/05 | Jim Meyers

Posted on 11/10/2005 5:09:14 PM PST by wagglebee

It has been more than two years since news first broke that Rush Limbaugh had an addiction to painkillers.

That news led to a criminal investigation of Limbaugh by Palm Beach County State Attorney Barry Krischer, who in December 2003 leaked to the media that his office had uncovered evidence of 10 felony counts, including "doctor shopping," money laundering and drug trafficking. Despite the sensational allegations, no charges have been brought.

Worse, in the latest round between the State Attorney's office and Limbaugh, Assistant State Attorney James Martz made a startling admission in open court on Tuesday as he sought a court order allowing his office to interview Rush's doctors.

Martz told Circuit Court Judge David Crow that his office has "no idea" if Limbaugh had even committed a crime, but still wanted the Florida judge to grant them the extraordinary privilege of interviewing Limbaugh's doctors without his consent.

Martz argued essentially that prosecutors were seeking a blank check to question Limbaugh's doctors and invade his privacy – all in search of a crime they admit they have no evidence was ever committed.

Martz insists he needs to put basic questions to Limbaugh's doctors. Despite two years of investigation – including an examination of Rush's private medical records – Martz told Judge Crow: "I have no idea if Mr. Limbaugh has completed the elements of any offense yet . . . unless we can ask several pertinent questions."

Earlier this year, Krischer's office won an 18-month legal battle to review Rush's medical records, arguing that these would prove whether he had committed a crime or not. Limbaugh lost at the circuit and appellate court levels, and the Florida Supreme Court declined to hear the case. The records were handed over in July.

Apparently, Limbaugh's medical records have not satisfied Krischer. A frustrated Roy Black, Limbaugh's attorney, said in response to the latest skirmish: "They cannot force Mr. Limbaugh to supply their evidence for them."

Black argued that confidentiality between a doctor and a patient is a privilege that even criminal investigators cannot penetrate. Judge Crow seemed to agree, telling Martz: "The statue says . .. categorically that the physician shall not discuss or cannot discuss the condition of a patient absent a written waiver. Period."

Since 2003, the state has been investigating allegations that Limbaugh illegally stocked up on prescription pain pills from several doctors, a third-degree felony called "doctor shopping."

Black has characterized the prosecutors' efforts as a "fishing expedition," and suggested that Limbaugh is being singled out because of his conservative political views.

Black said in an interview, when asked if Rush was being singled out: "Of all the millions of people addicted to painkillers, have you ever seen their doctors being subpoenaed? . . . They're trying to publicly embarrass him and ruin his radio program."

In fact, the Palm Beach Post, a paper with a strong anti-Limbaugh editorial bent, noted in March 2004 that doctor shopping has very rarely been prosecuted in this State Attorney's jurisdiction.

Black also made the point that it's almost unheard of for prosecutors to charge addicts with a crime after they go through rehabilitation.

Soon after publicly admitting his addiction, Limbaugh went public with his problem and entered an Arizona facility. He successfully completed the program and has been on the air broadcasting ever since.

Limbaugh also revealed that his addiction began after he underwent corrective back surgery and his doctor prescribed painkillers.

"Normally, people with drug dependencies who acknowledge their problems and seek treatment are lauded for their courage, not prosecuted," Black wrote in the Wall Street Journal.

"So am I wrong to wonder if something is out of whack when the Palm Beach County State Attorney pulls out all the stops in an effort to nail Rush?"

Black has revealed that initially Krischer planned on treating Limbaugh as his office treats similar cases and not prosecuting. But that abruptly changed when Limbaugh's stature brought publicity to the case and led to an organized e-mail campaign from Limbaugh detractors to Krischer demanding a political prosecution.

Krischer, a Democrat first elected to his post in 1992, had developed a reputation as being fair-minded.

But a careful examination of the facts suggests politics may be playing a larger role, and his prosecution is based on a flimsy case of doctor shopping.

Krischer's office has already leaked to the local press confidential details of Rush's medical records, including claims he obtained thousands of pills from several doctors.

But Black contends that information is nothing more than an effort to smear Limbaugh and that there has been no doctor shopping on Limbaugh's part.

"The prescription records that are in the search warrant affidavits should be put in perspective," he maintained in a statement issued in July.

"Of the 2,130 pills prescribed, only 1,863 were painkillers, and of those only 1,733 were for hydrocodone. These were to be taken over a period of 217 days, from the date of the first prescription until 30 days from the date of the last prescription.

"The dose averages out to a little over eight pills a day, which is not excessive and is in fact a lawful dose.

"Nine-two percent of the pain medication was prescribed by two doctors who were treating Mr. Limbaugh for back pain. They work in the same office from the same medical file, and there could be no doctor shopping between them . . .

"We continue to believe that Mr. Limbaugh is being pursued by overzealous prosecutors and that he should not be charged with any crime.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barrykrischer; dittoheads; limbaughaddiction; politicalprosecution; royblack; rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
If Rush was a leftist celebrity, he would be on every talk show in America talking about overcoming addiction.
1 posted on 11/10/2005 5:09:15 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
The prosecution cannot force the defendant to incriminate himself for them. Its time the trial judge ordered the case dismissed with prejudice and sanctioned the Palm Beach County D.A's office for wasting the court's time.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

2 posted on 11/10/2005 5:11:31 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I have to agree, the judge should end this now. The Fat Lady has been singing since the git-go with this case.


3 posted on 11/10/2005 5:13:02 PM PST by tioga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The whole pursuit of this was a liberal setup for day one. Using the judicial system has become the preferred method of radical leftists to attack those that BEAT THEM AT EVERY TURN, whether its on talk radio or at the ballot box.

This is why judicial reform needs to happen in a big way in this country. The judiciary has become a major political weapon, is abused constantly and without any serious accountability to the perps.


4 posted on 11/10/2005 5:14:32 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

All you need to do is compare & contrast the media treatment of Rush vs that of Robert Downey Jr. - there you have it...


5 posted on 11/10/2005 5:16:37 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (I'm going to quit procrastinating - starting tomorrow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Can Limbaugh sue the DA for malicious prosecution?


6 posted on 11/10/2005 5:18:49 PM PST by blastdad51 (Proud father of an Enduring Freedom vet, and friend of a soldier lost in Afghanistan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I am getting seriously fed up with these leftists! If they don't watch it, I will go out and campaign for republicans again!


7 posted on 11/10/2005 5:18:59 PM PST by westmichman (I vote Republican for the children and the poor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I wonder what has been promised to Krischer for pursuing this path of illegally prosecuting an American citizen?


8 posted on 11/10/2005 5:19:36 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

A frustrated Roy Black, Limbaugh's attorney, said in response to the latest skirmish: "They cannot force Mr. Limbaugh to supply their evidence for them."



What it amounts to is the prosecution is trying to force Rush to convict himself. Guilty until proven innocent isn't going to go over too good. This prosecutor isn't the only one who needs investigated.


9 posted on 11/10/2005 5:19:48 PM PST by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blastdad51
Can Limbaugh sue the DA for malicious prosecution?

If he cant, he should run for the office win it and resign.
10 posted on 11/10/2005 5:21:01 PM PST by PositiveCogins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

Or Kate Moss.


11 posted on 11/10/2005 5:21:06 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blastdad51

How about violations of Privacy Act and HIPAA?


12 posted on 11/10/2005 5:22:10 PM PST by axes_of_weezles (mainstream extremist (Ha))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

No mention in this article of the DA's mother, also a democrat activist, bragging at the county democrat meeting that her boy was going to put Rush Limbaugh in jail.


13 posted on 11/10/2005 5:26:15 PM PST by scotiamor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Its time the trial judge ordered the case dismissed with prejudice and sanctioned the Palm Beach County D.A's office for wasting the court's time.

There's been no case brought. No charges filed. There's nothing to dismiss except this prosecutor, and I don't see that happening anytime soon.

14 posted on 11/10/2005 5:27:59 PM PST by adamsjas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Corrected title:

The Political Persecution of Rush Limbaugh



As with the Tom Delay case, I do not understand why there couldn't/shouldn't be a Federal Civil Rights prosecution of these DA's, since they are persecuting these people under the color of government authority, simply because of the political beliefs of the persecuted.
15 posted on 11/10/2005 5:29:14 PM PST by rottndog (WOOF!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Let's have a closer look at your bank records, Mr. Martz. We'd like to know if you've paid all the taxes you owe.


16 posted on 11/10/2005 5:29:47 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I think we are starting to see a Democratic pattern here, with Rush being hounded over nothing, Tom Delay being hounded over nothing, Libby Scooter being hounded over nothing. This seems to be the latest Democratic operandi, get prosecutors to take out your political enemy for you.
but if you happen to be a Democrat, and you steal confidential documents by stuffing them down your pants, you get a pass, and an later an ambassadorship to France!
17 posted on 11/10/2005 5:35:17 PM PST by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Sheesh!

The Prosecutor is still searching for "evidence" after 2 years? Where's Ronnie Earle when you need him!!??

18 posted on 11/10/2005 5:35:39 PM PST by Gritty ("The bumper-sticker, 'War is Never the Answer', depends on the question! - Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Why don't the democrats just go ahead and sue to overturn that pesky, outdated Constitution. That seems to be their ultimate goal.

Stand your ground Rush.


19 posted on 11/10/2005 5:38:46 PM PST by Liberty Valance (T for Texas and T for Tennessee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I thought this was a kangaroo prosecution from the beginning, and was surprised at how many Freepers were critical of Rush. He had a painful back, his doctors prescribed pain killers, and he got hooked. Then he got himself unhooked. What is criminal or immoral about that?

The story evidently got out to the prosecutor when Rush refused to pay blackmail to a former housekeeper.

I'd say that this would appear to be part of a corrupt pattern of Democrat prosecutions of prominent Republicans. Limbaugh, DeLay, Libby. They can't beat them any other way, so they abuse their offices by bringing false or ludicrous charges against them.


20 posted on 11/10/2005 5:42:49 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson