Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did the Washington Post Violate the Electronic Communications Privacy Act? (MD4Bush)
NRO ^ | 11/10/05 | Stephen Spruiell

Posted on 11/10/2005 2:29:24 PM PST by Republican Red

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-123 next last
To: Brad Cloven
"This is getting to be fun. Long-run popcorn item..."

I love suspense, keeps you intrigued. I'll have some of that popcorn with butter. Please!

61 posted on 11/10/2005 4:04:08 PM PST by Spunky ("Everyone has a freedom of choice, but not of consequences.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

Rathergate or Watergate?

Something is rotten.


62 posted on 11/10/2005 4:18:34 PM PST by weegee (To understand the left is to rationalize how abortion can be a birthright.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #63 Removed by Moderator

To: Republican Red

Bump for later read.


64 posted on 11/10/2005 4:21:34 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

Bump for later read.


65 posted on 11/10/2005 4:21:39 PM PST by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

WaPo violated the law it appears, and certainly violated the confidential user agreement between MD4Bush and FreeRepublic.... and certainly severely violated Steffen's privacy, since he had reason to rely upon the terms of the FreeRepublic user agreement - he was not posting the controversial comment on any open forum with public access, it was made in a 1-on-1 private email communication. Anyway, as everyone has pointed out, it is MD4Bush who was playing the active role of spreading rumors and Steffern who was merely giving a passive and PRIVATE "yeah I heard that too".....

This was an obvious set-up, and the gross journalistic misconduct in this case needs to be compared with the parallel behaviors of the various MSM journalists who were (while not accessing private emails, so far as we know) dragging Libby and Rove into their own cesspool of rumor-mongering about Valerie Pflame and then Libby gets burned because of MSM whores.......


66 posted on 11/10/2005 4:21:58 PM PST by Enchante (Joe Wilson: "I don't know anything about uranium, but I did stay in a Holiday Inn last night!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: evad

"Talk radio, Free Republic and the Pajammadeen have inflicted a mighty blow for "truth, justice and the American way".
Which is why we will be outlawed by regulations next.


67 posted on 11/10/2005 4:23:12 PM PST by Babsig (www.genesysitsolutions.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

Very interesting post.


68 posted on 11/10/2005 4:23:29 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Getting better by the day. MediaBistro, BTW, is a good source for buzz inside MSM. If they notice, bet the WP does as well.

Whoa: More Newspaper Woes

"..The Washington Post clearly didn't have a very good weekend. First, circulation numbers continue to drop. Then, the Washington Post Company's third-quarter earnings dropped. And Jack Shafer takes them to task for royally excessive coverage of Charles and Camille (as in "10 pieces totaling 11,500 words" excessive"). Then there's this interesting--and fairly underreported--news item. Post reporter Matthew Mosk "may have violated a federal privacy law and the newspaper's ethical code when he used an unidentified person's account to view private conversations that linked a former aide to Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich's administration to a whisper campaign about a political rival."

Will the Post, like the White House, have to urge its staffers to "Let's Get Ethical! Ethical! I want to get Ethical! (Let me hear your body talk...)"?.."

69 posted on 11/10/2005 4:47:13 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
All they can do is wait and see if the hammer drops on them. It will get very interesting if that happens.

I'm hoping that it does, and that it is a very big hammer.

70 posted on 11/10/2005 4:57:08 PM PST by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma

I'm hoping it is in the form of a US Attorney and a Grand Jury. That would bypass the democratic controlled legislative
committee in Maryland that has no intention whatever of investigating who MD4Bush was.


71 posted on 11/10/2005 5:02:27 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

Are you just stupid? Laws don't apply to liberals! </disgusted sarcasm>


72 posted on 11/10/2005 5:08:24 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
You might enjoy my triad of news papers stocks this past year.

Delicious

73 posted on 11/10/2005 5:47:59 PM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: p23185

"Delicious!"

What is the really good news? Their poor stock performance may just be the appetizers with the main coursea and deserts to come. Many newspapers will not be around when GW watches his replacement sworn in in Feb 2009.


74 posted on 11/10/2005 5:51:34 PM PST by Grampa Dave (MSM/RATs need to set a timetable for withdrawal in their illegitimate war on Bush. It's a quagmire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: stacytec

That's not your sculpture, I hope!


75 posted on 11/10/2005 6:09:24 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

A Congressional hearing would be interesting.


76 posted on 11/10/2005 6:32:46 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven
This is getting to be fun. Long-run popcorn item...

I don't comment much on these MD4Bush threads, but I sure have a grin while I read them. It seems my grins get wider with each new development. heh heh ☺

Nam Vet

77 posted on 11/10/2005 6:33:30 PM PST by Nam Vet (The Gaulistinians are rioting to reclaim the ancient 'holy ground' of Paris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
This is going to be the Post's Rathergate before it is done.

The Post was involved in a domestic spying operation.

78 posted on 11/10/2005 6:38:27 PM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Many newspapers will not be around when GW watches his replacement sworn in in Feb 2009.

From a "lets get rid of old MSM" that is good news indeed. But I still like to get my news in the morning via hardcopy, rather than staring at a screen. I have pretty much learned over the past few years how to believe what I think is plausible and what is obvious MSM bias. For example I don't believe in any of these polls and it became so apparent in the Clintoon admin when he had a 70% approval rating during impeachment -comon!!

79 posted on 11/10/2005 6:50:54 PM PST by p23185 (Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Republican Red

"Did the Washington Post Violate the Electronic Communications Privacy Act?"

"Possibly" is the Post most favorite response. The Post, like Mapes, wants eveyone else to prove them wrong. I'm thinking the grand jury investigation, if it's legitimate, will find lots of things to blast the Post with.


80 posted on 11/10/2005 7:01:59 PM PST by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson