To: A CA Guy
Wrong again my friend..For the most part MEN of World War1 and World War11 were the providers for the family there was a wife to support and more than likely 4 or more children to support. They were EXPECTED to do this as women were EXPECTED to wait on there husbands and children it was a DUTY wether you liked it or not. Many married because the woman were pregnant, MEN did none of the child rearing it was ALL left up to the woman these were not great families they needed help and that is why you started to finally see a breakdown when the 60's rolled around.
407 posted on
11/10/2005 6:55:25 PM PST by
laney
(little bit country,little bit Rock and Roll!)
To: laney
Yes, there was a deep believe in morality back then along with a respect of others and life. So if two adults were risking unmarried sex and had a child from it, back then they often became a family and raised the children with is 100% correct and admirable.
That is a better situation than what we have today where you get a guy getting 7 women pregnant and not paying support for anything.
I'd rather they had married the first one and raised the kid.
Marriage is good for civilizing people.
It was good to be responsible regarding others instead of aborting them and flushing them down a toilet imo.
411 posted on
11/10/2005 7:00:25 PM PST by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson