To: Pikamax
In the book Mapes presents expert opinion and evidence that the accusation--all the stuff about typewriters, superscripts, proportional spacing and typefaces--was just wrong. She says the people who presented those arguments didn't know what they were talking about. WHAT?!?
7 posted on
11/10/2005 12:48:19 PM PST by
Yo-Yo
To: Yo-Yo
12 posted on
11/10/2005 12:49:55 PM PST by
Chena
(I'm not young enough to know everything.)
To: Yo-Yo
Has anybody here read the book?
It would be interesting to know what kind of expert opinion she has found. The forgery of the memos were on par with the Niger documents (if we are to believe the MSM and IAEA on those).
28 posted on
11/10/2005 12:58:17 PM PST by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
To: Yo-Yo
Not to mention that no self respecting Airman of any rank, Officer or Enlisted would write an official memorandum using such conversational language.
59 posted on
11/10/2005 1:21:37 PM PST by
musical_airman
(I never get into bloody Taglinius Freerepulicus! What about MY self esteem? ;))
To: Yo-Yo
What kind of proof does she want?
110 posted on
11/10/2005 7:57:32 PM PST by
DocRock
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson