Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: drjimmy
This is the third time I've told you that emergency bulletins would not be affected. Are you not listening on purpose?

While you're in the middle of making a fool of yourself, you might want to go back through your posts and add up how many times you have told Toespi that emergency bulletins would not be affected.

Post 164:

But it is not about removng the NWS's vital function of providing emergency warnings.

Post 253:

And again, if there is a major problem, an emergency warning, this information is quite obviously made public.

Post 282

This is the third time I've told you that emergency bulletins would not be affected.

You are all big boys and you can all obviously read posts even if your name is not in the "to:" field. So, yes, I have made the point three times. Now 4.

SD

304 posted on 11/10/2005 2:42:32 PM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies ]


To: SoothingDave

Evidently, you are not aware that weather over water is considerably uncertain. You may be on the water and have beautiful weather and thirty minutes later you are in the fight of your life. You can not be thirty minutes from shore and suddenly get an emergency weather bulletin, it is too late at that point on water. One has to make a decision BEFORE they leave port, not after the fact and NOAA is very helpful, along with experience in making that decision.


308 posted on 11/10/2005 2:49:47 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson