Not all Muslims are terrorists. The bombers blew up a wedding party full of Muslims. Most of those killed were Muslims.
Possibly true --- but how many Armed Muslims, exclusive of the Iraqi and Afghans who live there and have joined the coalition forces -- are fighting the Terrorists in their country?
I remain suspect of ALL that are not visibly and physically at risk and supporting us OPENLY and fighting terrorism and terrorists AND their supporters on the battlefield..
Muslims fit in one or more of several categories:
1. Long toothed murderous Jihadists.
2. Supporters and Cheering sections for the Jihadists.
3. "Moderate" Muslims --- those who haven't yet decided who is going to win and haven't yet pulled the pin on their grenade.
4. Muslims who quietly refuse to bow to or anger the Jihadists.
5. Muslims who attempt to fight the Jihadist with words, without drawing too much attention to themselves..
6. Muslims who fight the Jihadists OPENLY and with WEAPONS...
Category 6 Muslims are the only ones to trust....
The rest should be held suspect, until the achieve Cat-6 standing.
Semper Fi
Without Muslim support the terrorists could not survive for a week. Thery are like the Irish--and Irish-Americans--who funded the IRA. The term is emablers.
Most of the dead and injured may be Muslims, but al-Qaida announced the targets were Jews and 'crusaders', for which read: infidels, westerners, Americans.
Maybe they only took a day off from terrorism, to attend the wedding?