To: freebird5850
an interesting record, for sure, but is this the kind of thing we should be encouraging? i'd hate for the next daredevil pilot to try and beat this record and...fail...
5 posted on
11/10/2005 7:30:30 AM PST by
altoidboy
To: altoidboy
"an interesting record, for sure, but is this the kind of thing we should be encouraging? i'd hate for the next daredevil pilot to try and beat this record and...fail... "
So we never take any risks or make any strides because there are idiots in the world? Yes, let's all live down to the lowest common denominator. Wonderful idea.
20 posted on
11/10/2005 8:04:43 AM PST by
LIConFem
(A fronte praecipitium, a tergo lupi.)
To: altoidboy
There was nothing about this flight that qualifies it as a daredevil stunt; it was a calculated demonstration of the plane's long range capability.
For a single pilot to make such an attempt would be considered a daredevil act.
33 posted on
11/10/2005 8:42:02 AM PST by
Old Professer
(Fix the problem, not the blame!)
To: altoidboy
It's standard for long-haul Trans-Pacific flights to carry two pilot crews.
35 posted on
11/10/2005 8:54:33 AM PST by
ErnBatavia
(Frist would be a great Majority Leader if he had 65 seats..make that 75)
To: altoidboy
an interesting record, for sure, but is this the kind of thing we should be encouraging? i'd hate for the next daredevil pilot to try and beat this record and...fail... This type of thinking keeps us bound to the same spot. I am sure that in 1910 people were saying the same types of things, "Oh, we can't let those daredevil pilots fly 100 miles non-stop, what if they crash?"
43 posted on
11/10/2005 10:26:36 AM PST by
calex59
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson