Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Boeing jet arrives in London in attempt to break record for world's longest commercial flight
Wichita Eagle ^ | Thu, Nov. 10, 2005 | Associated Press

Posted on 11/10/2005 7:25:29 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

LONDON - A Boeing Co. jet arrived in London on Thursday at the end of an attempt to break the record for the longest nonstop flight by a commercial jet.

The 777-200LR Worldliner - one of Boeing's newest planes - touched down shortly after 1 p.m. (8 a.m. EST) at London's Heathrow Airport after an almost 23-hour journey of more than 12,586 miles from Hong Kong.

The flight traversed the Pacific Ocean and North America before landing in London.

Boeing said that Guinness World Records representatives would monitor the flight and attend the landing at London's Heathrow Airport.

The plane has four pilots and was carrying 35 passengers and crew, including Boeing representatives, journalists and customers.

Boeing wanted to fly the jet farther than a Boeing 747-400 that flew 10,500 miles from London to Sydney in 1989.

The record-breaking attempt is part of Boeing's fierce competition with its European rival Airbus. The Boeing 777-200LR Worldliner was designed to compete directly with the popular Airbus 340-500, which has a flight range of 10,380 miles.

After leaving Hong Kong, the Boeing jet was flying to the northern Pacific Ocean, crossing North America and cruising over the Atlantic Ocean to London, said Boeing spokesman Chuck Cadena. Hong Kong-London flights usually fly over Russia.

ON THE NET

The plane's flight path can be tracked at http://www.777.newairplane.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deepveinthrombosis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
 
"A Boeing Co. jet arrived in London on Thursday at the end of an attempt to break the record for the longest nonstop flight by a commercial jet."

If it took off in Hong Kong and landed in London the use of the word "attempt" seems to be a little misplaced.

 

 

 

21 posted on 11/10/2005 8:06:06 AM PST by HawaiianGecko (Facts are neither debatable nor open to "I have a right to this opinion" nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Who wants to stay on a plane for 23 hours? That alone raises questions about marketability.


22 posted on 11/10/2005 8:06:25 AM PST by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Ruckus of Dogs

Ever heard of Federal Express?


23 posted on 11/10/2005 8:09:29 AM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
 
"Tip for anyone traveling on a 10+ hour flight. Get a TV series DVD set like '24', watch 2 episodes"

I agree, I have a 10 hour flight I do a couple of times a year and it is absolute murder in coach. I normally waste the cash and go first class just to keep a blood clot from forming.

One would have to be young, in reasonably good shape and of very sound mind to do 23 hours in coach.

 

 

 

24 posted on 11/10/2005 8:12:19 AM PST by HawaiianGecko (Facts are neither debatable nor open to "I have a right to this opinion" nonsense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GRRRRR
Was that plane 'laden or unladen'????

I think that only pertains to swallows.

25 posted on 11/10/2005 8:18:00 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici
Was that plane 'laden or unladen'????

I think that only pertains to swallows.

African or European?

26 posted on 11/10/2005 8:23:11 AM PST by Netheron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Cliff Dweller

"At least on the MAC aircraft..."

1967. Sitting backwards in a C-141, Travis to Wake (fuel) to Pleiku City. About 18 hours total if I recall correctly. Much too long for me.


27 posted on 11/10/2005 8:26:00 AM PST by beelzepug (summer's over and I'm bummed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Netheron

Oh, well African of course!


28 posted on 11/10/2005 8:29:19 AM PST by VeniVidiVici (What? Me worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

The big deal is that it is a twin engine aircraft that flew so long and so far. There are different flight rules for twin and four-engine aircraft, such as twins must stay within a certain distance, en route, to an emergency landing site should an engine fail. This is a push to qualify the cheaper to buy, and less costly to operate, twins to fly the four engine routes.


29 posted on 11/10/2005 8:32:25 AM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

Poor writing; yes, it landed on time.

All that remains is certification by Guiness, I guess.


30 posted on 11/10/2005 8:38:28 AM PST by Old Professer (Fix the problem, not the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


The Boeing 777-200LR (longer range) Worldliner jet lands at Heathrow airport in London after setting an endurance record for a non-stop commercial flight November 10, 2005. The aircraft with 35 passengers and crew flew more than half way around the world, covering 11,664 nautical miles (21,601 km) taking 22 hours and 42 minutes, Boeing said. REUTERS/Paul Hackett


A Boeing 777-200LR (longer range) Worldliner jet taxis at Heathrow airport in London after setting an endurance record for a non-stop commercial flight, November 10, 2005. The aircraft with 35 passengers and crew flew more than half way around the world, covering 11,664 nautical miles (21,601 km) taking 22 hours and 42 minutes, Boeing said. REUTERS/Paul Hackett


A Boeing 777-200LR (longer range) Worldliner jet taxis at Heathrow airport in London after setting an endurance record for a non-stop commercial flight November 10, 2005. The aircraft with 35 passengers and crew flew more than half way around the world, covering 11,664 nautical miles (21,601 km) taking 22 hours and 42 minutes, Boeing said. REUTERS/Paul Hackett


In this photo released by Boeing, passengers pose in front of a Boeing 777-200LR before taking off at the Hong Kong airport Wed. Nov. 9, 2005. Boeing attempts to break a world record Wednesday by flying its new long-distance 777-200LR plane non-stop from Hong Kong east to London, farther than any previous commercial jet. (AP Photo/Boeing, HO)

http://www.777.newairplane.com/

31 posted on 11/10/2005 8:38:46 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

I think I was on the worlds longest flight going to Korea once ...


32 posted on 11/10/2005 8:41:39 AM PST by 11th_VA (Geezee Freepin Peezee ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: altoidboy

There was nothing about this flight that qualifies it as a daredevil stunt; it was a calculated demonstration of the plane's long range capability.

For a single pilot to make such an attempt would be considered a daredevil act.


33 posted on 11/10/2005 8:42:02 AM PST by Old Professer (Fix the problem, not the blame!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cliff Dweller
I would just feel like I lost a day, no wait I gained a day, no wait, lost, no gained, no... Time stood still for a day... That's it.

You can even go back in time....a couple of years ago I left Perth, West Australia at 11:45pm Wednesday, flew east to Sydney and spent Thursday morning in the airport until close to noon.

Took off for Honolulu (9 hour flight) that late Thursday morning and slowly went back in time. Landed Hono at 11:00 pm Wednesday, theoretically before I'd left Perth.

34 posted on 11/10/2005 8:53:25 AM PST by ErnBatavia (Frist would be a great Majority Leader if he had 65 seats..make that 75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: altoidboy

It's standard for long-haul Trans-Pacific flights to carry two pilot crews.


35 posted on 11/10/2005 8:54:33 AM PST by ErnBatavia (Frist would be a great Majority Leader if he had 65 seats..make that 75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: A.A. Cunningham

What happened to the other 13 passengers? Hmmmmmm Lost?


36 posted on 11/10/2005 8:58:42 AM PST by Cliff Dweller ("get thar fustest with the mostest." GEN NB Forrest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Pukin Dog
Tip for anyone traveling on a 10+ hour flight. Get a TV series DVD set...

Better tip for 10+ hour flights....

Get a First Class sleeper seat ;-)

37 posted on 11/10/2005 9:01:25 AM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I wonder if they had legal IFR reserves.


38 posted on 11/10/2005 9:12:38 AM PST by NY.SS-Bar9 (DR #1692)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elbucko

Now that makes more sense of things!

Thanks very much...


39 posted on 11/10/2005 9:13:19 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (History is soon Forgotten,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative

I hear you.

I don't care what company I'm working for at the time. If they want to put me on a plane for a flight longer than 5 hours, I demand business class or tell them to send someone else.

They have always ended up giving me business class.

I loved my lufthasa flight from Vancouver BC to Frankfurt a few years ago in business class. All the hot german stewardesses where working in the first class and business sections. They had the hags working in coach.
Coach was filled with pakistanis and stunk to high heaven from all BO. Once and a while I got up to strech my legs and took a walk from the front to the back of the plane. Once I walked through the curtin between business class and coach, I full expected to see goats walking around and people grilling meat in the aisles. I can't imagine what one of those Airbus A380's will smell like on some 10 hour flight from some 3rd world county packed with 700 unwashed people.


40 posted on 11/10/2005 9:38:28 AM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson