Skip to comments.
Andrea Mitchell: I 'Misspoke' on Plame ID
NewsMax.com ^
| Nov. 10, 2003
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 11/10/2005 6:32:51 AM PST by Carl/NewsMax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-249 next last
To: Carl/NewsMax
Which is why they belonged under oath long ago.
201
posted on
11/10/2005 2:29:31 PM PST
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Carl/NewsMax
Come to think of it, I think Libby WANTED to be indicted.
202
posted on
11/10/2005 2:31:16 PM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(Give Them Liberty Or Give Them Death! - IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
To: pgkdan
She's a back pedaling liar.She's an ugly woman with an ugly arrogant attitude ............ with twelve too many facelifts........... just about four more than the number of the hairs on her husband's pathetic combover!
203
posted on
11/10/2005 2:31:37 PM PST
by
beyond the sea
(Gloria Borger is Andrea Mitchell on Peyote)
To: Sam Hill
Novak's column didn't explain that Plame was covert, only that she worked for the CIA on WMD issues, or something like that, so Mitchell couldn't have learned that Plame was supposedly covert from Novak.
204
posted on
11/10/2005 2:35:49 PM PST
by
carola
To: Carl/NewsMax
Everybody in this matter is lying. Mitchell is lying, Wilson is lying, Cooper is lying. But the only one in trouble is Libby.
To: pgkdan
She can try it again in court.
206
posted on
11/10/2005 2:40:11 PM PST
by
lawnguy
(It works Napoleon, you don't even know.)
To: Carl/NewsMax
It's been said already, but I'll say it again: "She's a back-pedalling liar."
207
posted on
11/10/2005 2:40:43 PM PST
by
Petronski
(Cyborg is the greatest blessing I have ever known.)
To: beyond the sea
I don't think she's ugly, though when she was younger I thought she had a masculine face and her skin was heavily pock-marked. She seems to have had that taken care of. I didn't realize, until I started hearing her on Imus, what a left-winger she is.
208
posted on
11/10/2005 2:45:10 PM PST
by
carola
To: Carl/NewsMax
It seems to take quite a crew of liars to trash the Bush Administration. Wonder why.
To: pgkdan
210
posted on
11/10/2005 2:59:54 PM PST
by
Liberty Valance
(50 feet of tagline and a fresh pot of coffee)
To: Carl/NewsMax
Sounds like Mitchell doesn't want to get purged. She saw what happened to Judith Miller. The liberal MSM - you're either with 'em or against 'em.
To: oceanview
all potential acts of perjury in that grand jury should have been investigated and treated equally. the only way to make a potential perjurious act into an indictment, is to determine what is the basis for truth. unless you investigate, you can't determine that. And you know that this wasnt done, how? Were you a bug on the grand jury wall?
You seem to be willing to excuse anything the press has done in this. you say "Fitzgerald was charged with investigating whether white house people leaked the name". Imagine Plame had been covert, and the investigation showed it was Judith Miller who leaked her name - are you saying she should skate because Fitzgerald was only charged with indicting someone from the administration
Miller couldnt be indicted for leaking the name because she was not a government employee with access to classified information. The press can publish classified material and they cant be criminally charged for doing so. If Miller was the one that leaked it, someone in the government had to leak it to her first. She couldnt have been the leaker.
212
posted on
11/10/2005 3:10:02 PM PST
by
Dave S
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
Come to think of it, I think Libby WANTED to be indicted. Losing track of reality are we?
213
posted on
11/10/2005 3:13:53 PM PST
by
Dave S
To: Carl/NewsMax
Seems to me there must be a media campaign to get the story straight: nobody knew who Plame was until Novak's column came out.
To: popdonnelly
And possibly Rove. Do we know where the case against him stands. Apparently, Fitzgerald should advise him by next Tuesday (the 15th) whether he will be indicted.
If he's indicted, I'll be really, really angry. We'll have another 2 weeks of media hyperventilating.
To: Carl/NewsMax
Oh listen to this garbage! Makes you sick how easily they lie.
216
posted on
11/10/2005 3:50:01 PM PST
by
ladyinred
("Progressive" = code word for Communist/Nazi)
To: ladyinred
217
posted on
11/10/2005 3:50:47 PM PST
by
samadams2000
(Nothing fills the void of a passing hurricane better than government)
To: pgkdan
To: jennyjenny
So Wilson and Mitchell "misspeak" and Scooter Libby lies, is that about right?
...and may get 30 years for it.
219
posted on
11/10/2005 3:54:07 PM PST
by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: pgkdan
"She's a back pedaling liar."
I agree.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-249 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson