Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RunningWolf
Well you are wrong about even this most basic thing.

Was I wrong to say that it was Galileo who measured the acceleration of gravity by direct observation of falling objects?

Was I wrong to say that Newton asserted his equations applied to all objects in the universe -- something he could not possibly know from observation?

Was I wrong to say that Newton's equations were generally regarded as receiving their first great confirmation with the reappearance of Halley's comet?

On which statement was I wrong?

101 posted on 11/10/2005 9:00:44 AM PST by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]


To: js1138
I will get back to you have to go for now.
I need to brush up on my Science history again, so maybe you are not wrong about those things. I was getting of on a tangent there.

I still say this linkage of evo as equal to physical observations of phenomena like gravity is a false one.

Wolf
114 posted on 11/10/2005 9:20:23 AM PST by RunningWolf (tag line limbo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson