[RunningWolf]

I will get back to you have to go for now.
I need to brush up on my Science history again, so maybe you are not wrong about those things. I was getting of on a tangent there.

I still say this linkage of evo as equal to physical observations of phenomena like gravity is a false one.

Wolf

[Thatcherite]

I still say this linkage of evo as equal to physical observations of phenomena like gravity is a false one.

You can make unwarranted, unevidenced assertions until you are blue in the muzzle. It was garbage the first time you said it, and it is still garbage no matter how many times you repeat it. See if you can find a practicing physicist who agrees with you on that particular point before repeating it. We'll wait.

[js1138]

...so maybe you are not wrong about those things.

I have had to eat my words on these threads a couple of times, so I appreciate anyone who engages in an actual discussion.

Someone has pointed out to me that Galileo did not have the technology to make precise measurements of gravitational acceleration. There is no doubt that he made measurements.

Newton was one of the brightest men who ever lived, and his work is brilliant, but he built a cosmology out of a few data points. He no more observed the workings of the cosmos than Darwin witnessed dinosaurs mating.

Science is about building explanitory theories and looking for evidence to confirm or refute the expectations of theory.