Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pukin Dog
This is just a stupid maneuver to allow vulnerable politicians to claim that they voted against ANWAR. Their votes will not be needed in the final bill, which only requires 50% approval.

It won't be that easy.

From the WashPost this morning:

"But the Democrats did not budge, and at least 22 Republicans told the House leadership they would not vote for the sweeping bill unless the drilling provision was removed and they were given assurances that it would not return after House and Senate negotiators hash out a final measure." ... "In exchange for stripping out the energy provisions, however, enough GOP moderates promised their votes last night to all but ensure passage, said Sarah Chamberlain, executive director of the Republican Mainstreet Partnership, the moderate coalition that led negotiations." ... "One senior GOP aide in the Senate said Domenici and Stevens are willing to bottle up the budget package well into next year if the House does not relent on Arctic drilling." ... "Chamberlain said the members of her coalition stressed again last night that they would vote against any final agreement that reinstated the drilling provisions."

We're in for a lot of continuing resolutions, it appears.

262 posted on 11/10/2005 8:01:01 AM PST by cogitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: cogitator
We wont need their votes in the final package. There will be enough Democrats voting with us to beat them.
265 posted on 11/10/2005 8:08:55 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

To: cogitator
"But the Democrats did not budge, and at least 22 Republicans told the House leadership they would not vote for the sweeping bill

I've been searching through the threads here and Googling, but I can't find the names of the 22 RINOs who signed the letter. Anyone?

276 posted on 11/10/2005 8:22:20 AM PST by Spiff ("They start yelling, 'Murderer!' 'Traitor!' They call me by name." - Gael Murphy, Code Pink leader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

To: cogitator
Bring it on!

I'm as pissed as the rest of the folks here. Twenty years ago, I was against opening ANWR. Since then the low oil prices that that took its toll on American jobs in the oil patch have passed. We now get about 60 percent of our oil from overseas and our trade deficit, between that and China, has never been higher. We can make a dent in it by opening ANWR and environmentally it will be even safer for the surrounding area than it was 20 years ago.

Go Pete Go!!
279 posted on 11/10/2005 8:29:40 AM PST by CedarDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

To: cogitator

"Chamberlain said the members of her coalition stressed again last night that they would vote against any final agreement that reinstated the drilling provisions."

"We're in for a lot of continuing resolutions, it appears."

NO. We are in for an uprising against these idiot RINOs who are putting emotionalism and eco-extremism above common sense and Republican party unity.

The are a bunch of POS RINOs who need a quick swift kick in the rear.


358 posted on 11/12/2005 11:56:34 AM PST by WOSG (http://freedomstruth.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson