Skip to comments.
Patent issued for anti-gravity device
Science Daily.com ^
| November 9, 2005
| UPI
Posted on 11/09/2005 10:57:31 AM PST by aculeus
WASHINGTON, Nov. 9 (UPI) -- The U.S. patent office has reportedly granted a patent for an anti-gravity device -- breaking its rule to reject inventions that defy the laws of physics.
The journal Nature said patent 6,960,975 was granted Nov. 1 to Boris Volfson of Huntington, Ind., for a space vehicle propelled by a superconducting shield that alters the curvature of space-time outside the craft in a way that counteracts gravity.
One of the main theoretical arguments against anti-gravity is that it implies the availability of unlimited energy.
"If you design an anti-gravity machine, you've got a perpetual-motion machine," Robert Park of the American Physical Society told Nature.
Park said the action shows patent examiners are being duped by false science.
Copyright 2005 by United Press International. All Rights Reserved.
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: artbell; bullcrap; gravity; kooktokookam; patent; patentabuse; patentoffice; patents; podkletnov; pseudoscience
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-199 next last
The original contains links to other articles.
1
posted on
11/09/2005 10:57:31 AM PST
by
aculeus
To: aculeus
duped by false science Should we ping the 'global warming' crowd?
2
posted on
11/09/2005 10:59:02 AM PST
by
11Bush
To: aculeus
Well, should they, or when they, get one working...get back to me. It will be an historic and monumental day, but I am not holding my breath.
3
posted on
11/09/2005 10:59:04 AM PST
by
Jeff Head
(www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
To: aculeus
OK.... so where's my phaser... or how about that remarkable fuel-saving device, the transporter???
4
posted on
11/09/2005 10:59:14 AM PST
by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: 11Bush
Should we ping the 'global warming' crowd? Maybe you could ping the evolution crowd..... :)
5
posted on
11/09/2005 11:00:09 AM PST
by
kjam22
To: 11Bush
Not before I patent global warming. And global cooling too, for the residual royalties.
To: aculeus
alters the curvature of space-time outside the craftWarp field?
7
posted on
11/09/2005 11:01:17 AM PST
by
ASA Vet
(Those who know don't talk, those who talk don't know.)
To: aculeus
propelled by a superconducting shield that alters the curvature of space-time outside the craft in a way that counteracts gravity. He patented Hillary's Lovely Thighs?...........
8
posted on
11/09/2005 11:01:22 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Whatever happened to formulas 1 through 408?.........)
To: aculeus
Remnants of past thinking;
In the late 1800's the patent office once thought everything that could be invented had already been invented.
9
posted on
11/09/2005 11:01:23 AM PST
by
norraad
("What light!">Blues Brothers)
To: ASA Vet
Jack Daniels can do that.
10
posted on
11/09/2005 11:02:47 AM PST
by
Rakkasan1
(Peace de Resistance! Viva la Paper towels!)
To: aculeus
Park said the action shows patent examiners are being duped by false science. The patent office needs to hire more Einsteins.
Or at least examiners who've taken a little bit of physics.
To: Jeff Head
Well, should they, or when they, get one working...get back to me. It will be an historic and monumental day, but I am not holding my breath.Why not? We'll just come back in our time machine and revive you.
12
posted on
11/09/2005 11:04:03 AM PST
by
Squeako
(ACLU: "Only Christians, Boy Scouts and War Memorials are too vile to defend.")
To: aculeus
for a space vehicle propelled by a superconducting shield that alters the curvature of space-time outside the craft in a way that counteracts gravity.
Crap, I've been working on that very thing too. Sigh...back to the drawing board....
13
posted on
11/09/2005 11:05:34 AM PST
by
Millee
(As God as my witness, I thought turkeys could fly!!)
To: aculeus
Sounds like a warp drive.
To: aculeus
Anti-gravity device: a ladder?
To: aculeus
"One of the main theoretical arguments against anti-gravity is that it implies the availability of unlimited energy.
"If you design an anti-gravity machine, you've got a perpetual-motion machine," Robert Park of the American Physical Society told Nature. "
Only if it's a perpetual anti-gravity machine.
Something that counters the effects of gravity does not by definition require unlimited energy. That should be obvious.
To: aculeus
In related news, Amazon.com received a patent on an improvement that lets the user develop an antigrav warp field with one click.
17
posted on
11/09/2005 11:06:22 AM PST
by
thulldud
(The Democratic military vote is the REAL "Army of One".)
To: aculeus
I am a patent atty and have not looked at this but if anyone wants a PDF of it go to
http://www.pat2pdf.org/
and type in the #
18
posted on
11/09/2005 11:06:23 AM PST
by
freedomlover
(This Fall a Woman will be the Mother of a Mouse)
To: aculeus
How is it perpetual motion if all you are doing is blocking the effects of gravity?
19
posted on
11/09/2005 11:07:49 AM PST
by
Bigh4u2
(Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-199 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson