Posted on 11/09/2005 7:30:37 AM PST by kristinn
Who said MD4Bush is a 'his'? I get the vague impression it's that Lane woman who seemed to have a grudge against the gov. But that's just me.
".. The mayor again said he doesn't know the identity of MD4BUSH, and repeated he's just grateful that whoever it is exposed what he called a campaign of smear. O'Malley also said he did not know about the MD4BUSH postings when he brought up the rumor himself in November.
MD4BUSH did leave an as-yet undisclosed electronic trail in the Free Republic postings -- a trail a source describes as "sloppy"..."
The above is more indicative of how the Democratic Party actually feels about the actions of MD4Bush. They are grateful, but wish he had not left an electronic trail.
The rumors about O'Malley and Milkulski were around a LONG TIME before Steffen or MD4BUSH entered the scene. I heard the unsavory rumors about Milkulski, for instance, during the 1980s. The rumors about O'Malley were around in Democrat circles in Maryland well before the FR episode.
It seems like someone in Dem circles picked up on the MSM chatter about "conservative blogs" and FR and decided to try to create their own news with their own spin for political and ideological purposes.
I wish the Dems would stand behind their word for once and launch an investigation. I am confident that Ehrlich and his staffers have nothing to do with this, this brought morals to Maryland government -- for the first time in over three decades.
"It is despicable in my opinion," said Keiffer Mitchell, co-chairman of the state Democratic party. "It is gutter politics. It should not take place."
"We condemn MD4BUSH for getting caught and embarrassing the DemonRat party." said Keiffer Mitchell, co-chairman of the state Democratic party. "If you can't do a better job of concealing our modus operandi, then at least have the courtesy of leaving it to those of us who do not get caught. Also we would appreciate you not taking lessons from Mary Mapes. She no longer works for the party and her book stinks!"
Snicker!
Kerry's defeat and the Buckhead episode with Rathergate may have pushed them over the edge into permanent psychosis. These are pretty deranged people. O'Malley, supposedly, was once a Gary Hart volunteer. Well, we remember what happened to Gary Hart...
Kathleen Skakel Kennedy was a lousy candidate also.
The way they have tried to smear Ehrlich with the MD4BUSH-instigated insinuations on FR is the real "dirty tricks" story here. The Sun even ran with articles smearing ALL conservative bloggers in the post-Buckhead frenzy when Kerry supporters were seeking therapy and psychiatric treatment over the "moral values thing" in the 2004 presidential election. And it's not just local. Dan Rather has been traveling the country offering his own anti-blogger hysteria. He was practically in tears at one appearance. It may have been at The Kennedy School (I can't keep track of the liberal kook circuit).
Just consider that - Buckhead and FR have Dan Rather weeping and the Maryland Dems shooting themselves in the foot! And what are they upset about? They can't stand conservatives speaking up and pointing out their lunacies online. Essentially, they are AGAINST free speech!
But never underestimate the deviousness of an angry liberal woman in need of money and attention.
Hmmmm... Did Jim Robinson give us a clue?
Communications Director O'Doherty = a dirty tricks communications specialist.
To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
"Democrat operative."
"A democrat active in....Maryland politics..."
That's what we've suspected. Have they mentioned a name yet?
21 posted on 02/12/2005 8:09:49 AM EST by Quilla
To: Quilla
No, but the program host and station manager have both been on air stating that they were first approached with the rumor by a "Democrat operative" associated with Montgomery County politics. This would imply a regional rival for the governor's race INSIDE the Democrat Party.
29 posted on 02/12/2005 8:14:30 AM EST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1341711/posts?page=29#29
WHAT DID THE WASHINGTON POST KNOW, AND WHEN DID THEY KNOW IT?
Incredible that you could pull up that post from so many months ago. Kudos.
Hee, hee, hee..
It's no big secret that O'Malley has exalted ambitions for high office even imagining possible runs for the Senate and the Presidency in the future. He was planning to run for Governor. He knew he had to confront these rumors because, well, it seems they may even be true. The mayor likes to party. Somehow through that creepy communications specialist maze of the Dems - in between partying it up in New York and Miami, and various bare-shouldered steroided-up guitar outings - it was arranged to stage this FR PR stunt in orchestrated coordination with The Washington Post and The Baltimore Sun. The mayor himself stood before the television cameras, in a Clintonesque moment reminiscent of Clinton's crocodile tears at Ron Brown's funeral, and told a pure white lie - claiming that the rumors harming his "family" had been started on FR by someone on the governor's staff (something he and ALL Dems knew was not true).
ROFLMAO.
That must have been one of the co-chairman--the Rats have elevated double speak to an art when one of their chairmen calls MD4BUSH a hero and the other condemns him. No wonder John Kerry was their nominee.
Since the original MSM spin to this story was that someone on the Governor's staff was the "source" of rumors about the mayor's recreational night life , don't they now have the burden of telling their readers and viewers what the actual known origins are of reports of mayoral immorality?
Since Joe Steffen lost his job over this brouhaha, shouldn't MD4BUSH be held to the same standard? Or does the media offer amnesty for liberal Democrats when they are caught engaged in smear operations?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.