Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GrandEagle
...led officers to evidence later used to charge her husband with cocaine possession...
----

I can't believe that you would rather have a drug addict living in your backyard all because he had the drugs inside his house and doesn't want to invite the police into his home and find them. I doubt that most criminals are going to invite the police in and find their evidence.
I don't want the police invading a home anytime they like, but when they are being told there is contraband inside a home, and are being asked to retrieve the contraband, that they should have to still wait and ask every occupant of the home if it is okay or not.
28 posted on 11/08/2005 2:54:46 PM PST by downtoliberalism ("A coalition partner must do more than just express sympathy, a coalition partner must perform,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: downtoliberalism
I can't believe that you would rather have a drug addict living in your backyard all because he had the drugs inside his house and doesn't want to invite the police into his home and find them.

Honestly? I would rather have a drug addict living next door than give the police the power to search my house without my consent and without a warrant.

33 posted on 11/08/2005 3:03:27 PM PST by Palisades (Cthulhu in 2008! Why settle for the lesser evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: downtoliberalism
Sorry, believe it. If they had reason to believe there was criminal activity then they could easily get a search warrant. To have it any other way... well, the cure would be far worse than the disease.
either we make the government obey the rules, or there are no rules.

Cordially,
GE
34 posted on 11/08/2005 3:05:18 PM PST by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: downtoliberalism

And why wasn't SHE charged?
Possession isn't proved just cause she says,"It's his!".

A competent lawyer should have a field day with this one.


52 posted on 11/08/2005 3:42:35 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: downtoliberalism
I don't want the police invading a home anytime they like, but when they are being told there is contraband inside a home, and are being asked to retrieve the contraband, that they should have to still wait and ask every occupant of the home if it is okay or not.

I see your problem already. The police don't need to ask each and every occupant if it's ok to search. The police only need to ask a single judge. We could toss out ALL warrantless searches and not hurt anything.

58 posted on 11/08/2005 3:49:02 PM PST by Melas (What!? Read or learn something? Why would anyone do that, when they can just go on being stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: downtoliberalism
I can't believe that you would rather have a drug addict living in your backyard all because he had the drugs inside his house and doesn't want to invite the police into his home and find them.

Yes, I would rather make the police get enough evidence for a warrant than to simply invade anyone's house because they thought someone was a drug addict.
78 posted on 11/08/2005 4:59:36 PM PST by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson