Skip to comments.
Math problems too big for our brains
Ottawa Citizen via The Windsor Star ^
| November 8 2005
Posted on 11/08/2005 8:48:52 AM PST by RightWingAtheist
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-177 next last
To: MineralMan
"
Really? I can prove that 2 + 2 = 11"
Yep, I questioned immediately whether that statement really came from a serious mathmetician. I am but a mere physicist and I know that the answer depends on what base you are using.
41
posted on
11/08/2005 9:18:25 AM PST
by
gondramB
To: theDentist
Getting ready for the new P.C. Social Theory: Kids fail at math because humans weren't designed to understand math. It's not their fault if they bring home 'F'.In other news, 8 Year enters...
42
posted on
11/08/2005 9:18:30 AM PST
by
Clock King
("How will it end?" - Emperor; "In Fire." - Kosh)
To: RightWingAtheist
![](http://prof.ccems.pt/PREIS/images/bigumby.gif)
My brain hurts!
43
posted on
11/08/2005 9:18:35 AM PST
by
kidd
To: RightWingAtheist
"Basically, mathematicians are not very good philosophers."I don't want to start a flame war, but in my academic experience(chiefly in Logic seminars), this was generally true.
Of course, the converse is true, as well.
44
posted on
11/08/2005 9:19:07 AM PST
by
headsonpikes
(The Liberal Party of Canada are not b*stards - b*stards have mothers!)
To: Sofa King
"Then that's redefining what the 11 is."
Nope. It's not. The article said that 2+2=4. It does, in several number bases. It does not equal 4 in base 3. Without defining the number system you are using, such statements are false.
As several people noticed, 2+2=11 ONLY in base 3, but the sum is correct as written. Since the number base was not defined in the first example, I have changed nothing about the definition. I simply used a different base and came up with a different answer.
The article said that 2+2=4 always. That is clearly not true.
Now, I do not know of a practical use for Base 3 math, although they may be one, if there is a physical system somewhere that has three states.
45
posted on
11/08/2005 9:19:09 AM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: Vicomte13
Russia touches at least 10 other countries. If you only used four colors, you would have to have the same color touching at least thrice. Yes, but those 10 (may be more than that now...) don't all touch each other. Thus, Russia is color 1, and all the others touching it are 2, 3, or 4.
46
posted on
11/08/2005 9:19:18 AM PST
by
LexBaird
(tyrannosaurus Lex, unapologetic carnivore)
To: RightWingAtheist
Well, now we know where the French surrender to the Muslims has gone - it's in Ottawa surrendering to the EVIL genius of Dr. Computer Math!!!
I'll bet the ancient Greeks, Mayans and Aztecs would argue the premise that human brains can't handle math.
I'll also bet that medical science will dispute the argument that our brains have shrunk and can't handle today's math problems.
Finally, I'll bet that this idiot has become lazy and has grown too reliant on his computer and calculator to perform the tasks that manually solving math problems used to require.
47
posted on
11/08/2005 9:20:20 AM PST
by
DustyMoment
(FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
To: Vicomte13
You didn't read it clearly: all that's required is that Russia be a different color than any color touching it, not that all countries touching it be a different color, unless they themselves touch. So, Mongolia and Finland can be the same color.
48
posted on
11/08/2005 9:22:27 AM PST
by
1L
To: RightWingAtheist
Math has been the only sure form of knowledge since the ancient Greeks, 2,500 years ago.
Incorrect, it's not a sure form of knowledge because we can't even prove numbers have any external existence.
49
posted on
11/08/2005 9:22:44 AM PST
by
DarkSavant
(I touch myself at thoughts of flames)
To: RightWingAtheist
A few still do it the old-fashioned way, he says: "By individuals sitting in their rooms for long periods, thinking. A few? Most mathematics papers are still single-author. 75% or 80% if memory serves. A lot of highly significant results in mathematics are still created by lone wolf thinkers.
50
posted on
11/08/2005 9:28:11 AM PST
by
megatherium
(Hecho in China)
To: MineralMan
There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those that can count in binary and those that can't.
51
posted on
11/08/2005 9:31:12 AM PST
by
ko_kyi
To: MineralMan
"Without defining the number system you are using, such statements are false."
If you don't define your number system, then you're talking about base 10. That 10 means 1x10^1 + 0x10^0 is defined in our language, and if you don't specifically state that you're redefining it to mean 1x3^1 + 1x3^0, then 2 + 2 = 11 is wrong. Math books, calculators, and most programming languages work that way.
52
posted on
11/08/2005 9:33:09 AM PST
by
Sofa King
(A wise man uses compromise as an alternative to defeat. A fool uses it as an alternative to victory.)
To: RightWingAtheist
Assume a=b=1
then
(a+1)=(b+1), (a-1)=(b-1), and (a*a)-1=(b*b)-1
and ......
(a*a)-(b*b)=(a-b)
use this last equation and apply the difference of 2 squares
(a+b)*(a-b)=(a-b)
divide both sides of the equation by (a-b)
(a+b)=(a-b)/(a-b)=1
since a=b=1, and substituting for a and b
1+1=1 or
2=1
To: Sofa King
"If you don't define your number system, then you're talking about base 10. "
Not so. That is your assumption, and it is not accurate. If I am reading a book on programming, there will be a different assumption, depending on the type of computer being programmed.
The moment I write 2+2=11, everyone should know I'm in Base 3. If I write 2+2=10, then I'm in Base 4. In all bases from 5 up, 2+2=4.
54
posted on
11/08/2005 9:35:54 AM PST
by
MineralMan
(godless atheist)
To: RightWingAtheist
55
posted on
11/08/2005 9:38:26 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick; null and void
I thought it is always my fault, except when it isn't.
;-)
56
posted on
11/08/2005 9:38:36 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(I'm not suspicious & I hope it's nutritious but I think this sandwich is made of mime.)
To: CardCarryingMember.VastRightWC
57
posted on
11/08/2005 9:38:51 AM PST
by
mollynme
(cogito, ergo freepum)
To: MineralMan
Base 8 is like base 10, really... if you're missing two fingers.
- Tom Lehrer
58
posted on
11/08/2005 9:39:38 AM PST
by
SlowBoat407
(The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
To: MineralMan
I can prove that 2 + 2 = 11 Ha. I can show that 5 + 4 = 4.
To: RightWingAtheist
"We are beginning to see the limits of our ability to understand things."
Welcome to the rest of life, baby!
60
posted on
11/08/2005 9:45:58 AM PST
by
aruanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-177 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson