To: TBP
I don't know.
I recoil every time somebody says "We need to do it for the children" - that's the cover for all sorts of statist michief.
Personally, I'd rather see marriages harder to get *into*. Make people think about what they're doing before the fact rather than keep them in a bad situation after the fact. I don't think that's very good for children, either.
2 posted on
11/08/2005 8:04:11 AM PST by
highball
("I find that the harder I work, the more luck I seem to have." -- Thomas Jefferson)
To: highball
Personally, I'd rather see marriages harder to get *into*.
Only if you remove children from unwed mothers, otherwise you will generate more illegitimate births and/or abortions.
9 posted on
11/08/2005 8:13:52 AM PST by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: highball
Personally, I'd rather see marriages harder to get *into*. Make people think about what they're doing before the fact rather than keep them in a bad situation after the fact. I don't think that's very good for children, either. Agreed, but then you have the folks who have the children first and the claim is made that the marriage then provides for stability.
26 posted on
11/08/2005 8:24:48 AM PST by
Gondring
(I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
To: highball
"We need to do it for the children" Yep, they don't care for the kids, but an inlook into your homes to find an excuse to seize assets and the kids for the benefit of the government.
I think a divorce is better than staying married to a pedophile spouse or a fornicating one having a pedophile boyfriend around... yet our courts will side with the trouble maker because they want to encourage divorce so as to pay judges and lawyers.
Unless divorce becomes a federal issue "divorced" from the local conflict of interests of counties who think through them they can own people, we are dead. Then again our Federal School system is no good either, but at least interstate commerce would not be hampered by a bunch of ugly feminist lawyer money bags
49 posted on
11/08/2005 8:48:08 AM PST by
JudgemAll
(Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
To: highball
Personally, I'd rather see marriages harder to get *into*. Make people think about what they're doing before the fact rather than keep them in a bad situation after the fact. I don't think that's very good for children, either. I believe the article reports that about two-thirds of divorces are from low-conflict marriages; i.e., marriages that can't really be defined as a 'bad situation' except from the narcissistic viewpoint of the parents.
To: highball
"Personally, I'd rather see marriages harder to get *into*."
Me, too. I heard a relationship "expert" on the radio say: "The problem is not that there are too many divorces, the problem is that there are too many marriages."
83 posted on
11/08/2005 9:26:22 AM PST by
manwiththehands
("They wanted a Harley, they got a Scooter Libby." -Don Surber)
To: highball
Personally, I'd rather see marriages harder to get *into*.
I'd rather it be harder to have children. Maybe a waiting period after marriage to see if it will last.
To: highball
Divorce rarely solves anything ... it merely perpetuates the problem and everyone involved is hurt.
Retrouvaille.org is an amazing organization which is truly pro-marriage. Nearly 80% of deeply troubled marriages can be saved.
183 posted on
11/08/2005 1:42:45 PM PST by
Brass
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson