Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tony Snow; All

The search-&-destroy mission against children
http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47262

Time To End The Ninth Circuit Circus
http://www.pardonmyenglish.com/archives/2005/11/time_to_end_the.html

Liberals Believe Children Property of the State
http://www.chronwatch.com/content/contentDisplay.asp?aid=17738

Parental Rights Decision Called 'Cause for Great Alarm'
http://www.gopusa.com/news/2005/november/1107_parental_rights1.shtml

The Parent Trap
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=20090

Ninth Circuit Rules:
School’s Queries About Sexual Feelings Not a Privacy Violation
(or attempt to explain the ruling)
http://www.metnews.com/articles/2005/fiel110305.htm


341 posted on 11/07/2005 7:31:08 AM PST by AliVeritas (Weldon Ops, Earle Fatwa Team, Pork Jihadi, MOOSEMUSS, Stick Brigade, Go Steele)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies ]


To: AliVeritas

Where would we be without you, Ali? MANY thanks to you for all your excellent research and links:)


344 posted on 11/07/2005 7:32:58 AM PST by SE Mom (God Bless those who serve..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

To: AliVeritas
I'd like to know how the 9th Circuit got around the Federal Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA):

The Protection of Pupil Rights Amendment (PPRA) (20 U.S.C. § 1232h; 34 CFR Part 98) applies to programs that receive funding from the U.S. Department of Education (ED). PPRA is intended to protect the rights of parents and students in two ways:

* It seeks to ensure that schools and contractors make instructional materials available for inspection by parents if those materials will be used in connection with an ED-funded survey, analysis, or evaluation in which their children participate; and

* It seeks to ensure that schools and contractors obtain written parental consent before minor students are required to participate in any ED-funded survey, analysis, or evaluation that reveals information concerning:

1. Political affiliations;
2. Mental and psychological problems potentially embarrassing to the student and his/her family;
3. Sex behavior and attitudes;
4. Illegal, anti-social, self-incriminating and demeaning behavior;
5. Critical appraisals of other individuals with whom respondents have close family relationships;
6. Legally recognized privileged or analogous relationships, such as those of lawyers, physicians, and ministers; or
7. Income (other than that required by law to determine eligibility for participation in a program or for receiving financial assistance under such program).

Parents or students who believe their rights under PPRA may have been violated may file a complaint with ED by writing the Family Policy Compliance Office. Complaints must contain specific allegations of fact giving reasonable cause to believe that a violation of PPRA occurred.

Family Policy Compliance Office
U.S. Department of Education
400 Maryland Avenue, SW
Washington, D.C. 20202-5920

383 posted on 11/07/2005 7:44:48 AM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

To: AliVeritas

I would love for one of the Republican Senators, like oh say, George Allen stand up on the Senate floor today...and make a hugh deal about this....

This is perfect timing, actually, because I think the subject of making new "circuits" out West are on the table for a vote soon...

BUT, when I remember Tom Daschle standing at the podium and hitting it with his fist and shouting "outrageous"...that is what I want a Republican to do today!!! re: the 9th decision on the sex education.


464 posted on 11/07/2005 8:14:47 AM PST by Txsleuth (I am the real TXSLEUTH...please freepmail me if you doubt it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson