Cross may return to Redlands' city logo

SB Sun ^ | Brad A. Greenberg, Staff Writer

[Jay777]

READ THE ANTI ACLU VERSION HERE!!!

[Jay777]

PING!

[Zack Nguyen]

Good to say a city standing up to the bullies at the ACLU.

[Jay777]

The original news link that I posted on my site is gone now, but you can see what it says Here Pay particular attention to this: This is the first time this has happened, to my knowledge,” said ACLU attorney Peter Eliasberg, who tracks crosses on seals statewide. He said it is “highly likely” a lawsuit would be filed against the city if it reinstates the cross.

[Jay777]

Question to All, Can I link a something from the Corner on the main page?

[muawiyah]

Lost his job eh?

He can still walk.

[MadManDan]

Funny how the ACLU will jump to for two (possibly fictitious) offended people; but will willingly offend MILLIONS of people on a daily basis. Douchebags.

[MadManDan]

Funny how the ACLU will jump to for two (possibly fictitious) offended people; but will willingly offend MILLIONS of people on a daily basis. Douchebags.

[VastRWCon]

wow... you see MSM this IS NEWS. Goodluck to the people of Redlands!!!!

[MadManDan]

Damn dial-up... Sorry for the double post.

[gobucks]

Please add me to your ping list...

[Jay777]

Absolutely, got you added.

[Dr.Syn]

“This is the first time this has happened, to my knowledge,” said ACLU attorney Peter Eliasberg, who tracks crosses on seals statewide.

Maybe the "Redlands Two" can next testify that Eliasberg is a cross molester or maybe even a pedophile. They can claim anything because they don't exist and Eliasberg has some real issues. What a crazy world....

[goldstategop]

The cross should be reinstated by voters. Someone has to stand up somewhere to the ACLU's Secular Jihad. Hopefully, Los Angeles County voters will soon follow suit as well.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

[little jeremiah]

later pingout.

[etlib]

"We weren't looking to pick a fight with the city of Redlands," said Peter Eliasberg, managing attorney of the Southern California ACLU.

In other words: "We expect them to roll over and do whatever we say."

[proudpapa]

Sounds to me like the good folks of Redlands are calling the ACLU's bluff.

The ACLU doesn't even have a pair of deuce's.

This won't cost $500,000. Maybe $5,000 but not $500,000.

They should sue the ACLU for legal fee's afterwards.

[Liz]

Let the word go out to these unabashed, lowlife Christian-haters: Christians are not standing around waiting for the ACLU's "stamp of approval" to conduct our activities.

The clueless ACLU has yet to wakeup to the fact that they have been allowed to exist only because of the magnanimity and forbearance of Christians.

The ACLU has clearly crossed the line.

The ACLU is in for a rude awakening.

Too bad.

[Piquaboy]

Who would believe anything that the ACLU had to say? You might as well listen to a Damolcrap.

[purpleland]

What about the fishes removed from logos? The little fishes? Gad! Crosses and fishes - enough to drive any loony atheist loonier.

Reminds us how far absurdity goes when the defering Brits ban personal images of cute pigs and the display or very existence of Piggy Banks so as NOT TO OFFEND the sensitivity of Muslims/Islamics. Lopped-off human heads and stoned-to-death women are okay to display in the village streets as moral lessons.

Hasn't the ACLU extended its claws to cover "civil rights" in England? Thought I read somewhere the ACLU opened an office in England. Maybe they're going to sue for removal of conspiciously religious church bell towers and spires.