Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

British Troops Betrayed by Their Own
The Sunday Times - Britian ^

Posted on 11/06/2005 10:15:09 AM PST by SelectiveJNJ

The Sunday Times November 06, 2005

Iraq battle stress worse than WWII MICHAEL SMITH

SENIOR army doctors have warned that troops in Iraq are suffering levels of battle stress not experienced since the second world war because of fears that if they shoot an insurgent, they will end up in court.

The two senior Royal Army Medical Corps officers, one of whom is a psychologist, have recently returned from Basra, where they said they counselled young soldiers who feared a military police investigation as much as they did the insurgents.

The revelations follow the collapse last week of the court martial of seven paratroopers accused of murdering an Iraqi who died near al- Amarah just after the war and amid signs of a dramatic drop in morale among frontline infantry soldiers.

The doctors’ warnings came in post-operational reports submitted by senior officers to their formation commanders after serving in a battle zone. They are exceptional because of their content.

One source said: “There doesn’t appear to be any overt consideration or understanding of the pressures that our soldiers are under.

“The unpopularity of the war at home and a belief that firing their rifles in virtually any circumstances is likely to see them end up in court are sapping morale.”

One corporal said that troops arriving in Basra were confronted by warnings from the Royal Military Police. “They make it clear that any and every incident will be investigated. It is also made clear that if you shoot someone, you will face an inquiry that could take up to a year.

For the rest of the article: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1859664_2,00.html

(Excerpt) Read more at timesonline.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: afghanistan; allies; british; iraq; support; troops
It is a down right sin for the powers that be in the United Kingdom to turn its back on their soliders! If the British public is unwilling to show their support for their troops then WE Americans should do so in their place! Would anyone else be interested in sending care packages sent to the British soliders in Iraq and Afghanistan to show that America supports their efforts along with our own soliders? If so please email me.
1 posted on 11/06/2005 10:15:10 AM PST by SelectiveJNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SelectiveJNJ

To paraphrase Patton - '' I'd rather have a terrorist in front of me than a Leftist behind me.''


2 posted on 11/06/2005 10:17:53 AM PST by Lexington Green (''America has the watches. We have the time.'' -- Al-Zawahiri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SelectiveJNJ

American troops have the same problems.

The World Court, the MSN, POW treatment stories, etc makes all the sideline issues harder on the troops in combat.

Look at the nut balls in Europe that wanted to have President Bush arrested when he came for a visit. Nut balls all.


3 posted on 11/06/2005 10:18:30 AM PST by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SelectiveJNJ

Can you imagine a soldier in WWII being tried in court if he shot a Wermacht soldier in battle? Or a Japanese soldier?

We live in queer and bizarre times. Something should be done about this. That's too much of a burden to put on combat troops.

Kill Political Correctness RIGHT NOW!


4 posted on 11/06/2005 10:23:43 AM PST by RoadTest (Prince Chuck - proof that the end of the road for inbreeding is a dead end)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SelectiveJNJ
If the British public is unwilling to show their support for their troops.....

"For it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' "Chuck him out, the brute!"
But it's "Saviour of 'is country" when the guns begin to shoot;
An' it's Tommy this, an' Tommy that, an' anything you please;
An' Tommy ain't a bloomin' fool -- you bet that Tommy sees!"

.....Kipling.

5 posted on 11/06/2005 10:31:33 AM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570



"American troops have the same problems."

Agreed. Consider Panatano.

It's a worldwide strategy being pursued by the worldwide organized hard left (WOHL). Pretending there is no difference between soldiering and policing.


6 posted on 11/06/2005 10:33:59 AM PST by strategofr (The secret of happiness is freedom. And the secret of freedom is courage.---Thucydities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest

Sometimes I wander if we are fighting the wrong enemy.


7 posted on 11/06/2005 10:34:42 AM PST by bubman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elbucko

".....Kipling."

Good ref.


8 posted on 11/06/2005 10:34:53 AM PST by strategofr (The secret of happiness is freedom. And the secret of freedom is courage.---Thucydities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SelectiveJNJ

I smell a mutiny!


9 posted on 11/06/2005 10:42:29 AM PST by Mister Da (Nuke 'em til they glow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green
To paraphrase Patton - '' I'd rather have a terrorist in front of me than a Leftist behind me.''

My reply - '' I'd rather have a leftist in front of me than a terrorist behind me.'' Put the SOBs infront where you can line up your sights on them!

10 posted on 11/06/2005 10:59:16 AM PST by dvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SelectiveJNJ

it's the lawyers.....


11 posted on 11/06/2005 11:10:07 AM PST by injin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elbucko; strategofr

The JAG guys need to tour the front lines, another Kipling reference:

Pagett, M.P.
Rudyard Kipling

The toad beneath the harrow knows
Exactly where each tooth-point goes.
The butterfly upon the road
Preaches contentment to that toad.

PAGETT, M.P., was a liar, and a fluent liar therewith—
He spoke of the heat of India as the “Asian Solar Myth”;
Came on a four months’ visit, to “study the East,” in November,
And I got him to sign an agreement vowing to stay till September.

March came in with the koïl. Pagett was cool and gay,
Called me a “bloated Brahmin,” talked of my “princely pay.”
March went out with the roses. “Where is your heat?” said he.
“Coming,” said I to Pagett, “Skittles!” said Pagett, M.P.

April began with the punkah, coolies, and prickly-heat,—
Pagett was dear to mosquitoes, sandflies found him a treat.
He grew speckled and mumpy-hammered, I grieve to say,
Aryan brothers who fanned him, in an illiberal way.

May set in with a dust-storm,—Pagett went down with the sun.
All the delights of the season tickled him one by one.
Imprimis—ten day’s “liver”—due to his drinking beer;
Later, a dose of fever—slight, but he called it severe.

Dysent’ry touched him in June, after the Chota Bursat—
Lowered his portly person—made him yearn to depart.
He didn’t call me a “Brahmin,” or “bloated,” or “overpaid,”
But seemed to think it a wonder that any one stayed.

July was a trifle unhealthy,—Pagett was ill with fear.
’Called it the “Cholera Morbus,” hinted that life was dear.
He babbled of “Eastern Exile,” and mentioned his home with tears;
But I haven’t seen my children for close upon seven years.

We reached a hundred and twenty once in the Court at noon,
(I’ve mentioned Pagett was portly) Pagett, went off in a swoon.
That was an end to the business; Pagett, the perjured, fled
With a practical, working knowledge of “Solar Myths” in his head.

And I laughed as I drove from the station, but the mirth died out on my lips
As I thought of the fools like Pagett who write of their “Eastern trips,”
And the sneers of the traveled idiots who duly misgovern the land,
And I prayed to the Lord to deliver another one into my hand.


12 posted on 11/06/2005 11:38:56 AM PST by fallujah-nuker (America needs more SAC and less empty sacs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: PeteB570
Exactly.

And take a look at the sickening McCain Bill over the use of interrogation methods used by our military to obtain information from terrorists. Now our stupid Senators are going to write a manual on what our military agents can and cannot do to acquire information from terrorists. These Senators are hamstringing our military capabilities to protect the citizens of the USA.

If I were on the Senate floor debating over this incredibly stupid bill I would do nothing but run a slide show of photo's on just what our military did in WW11 when they got hold of senior enemy combatants.

They lined the ba$tards up and shot them dead on the spot.

Our Representatives in Government are going to kill us all with their stupidity and their evil machinations.
14 posted on 11/06/2005 11:58:18 AM PST by Sweetjustusnow (The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them away. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fallujah-nuker
The butterfly upon the road
Preaches contentment to that toad.

LOL!

This made me laugh so quick that I had to respond. It reminded me of my business attorneys. Butterfly's, however, just fly away at the approach of danger while lawyers just stand there in court or conference and piddle down their leg. I'm going to make phrase that into a plaque and present it to one of my favorite legal "pissers".

15 posted on 11/06/2005 12:59:45 PM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fallujah-nuker
And the sneers of the traveled idiots who duly misgovern the land,

The Kennedy's, Durbin's, Kerry's, we all know their names. The "imbedded reporters", who are nothing more than spies. It seems that nothing has really changed in the hundred years , or so, that Kipling penned the condition of man on the frontier of human nature. We can progress technically, but we will need to evolve further, as a species, before we are able to recognize the enemy in our midst.

16 posted on 11/06/2005 1:11:37 PM PST by elbucko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SelectiveJNJ
The solution is pretty simple. Under those "rules of engagement" I would refuse to fight.
If things are bad now, what would be the reaction if soldiers are shot for refusing to obey "official" but immoral orders? e.g. Go take care of the enemy but you better not kill any of them...

All "civilians" in danger under the present circumstances are either enemy combatants out of uniform, or supporters of them, complicit through their silence.
For our young soldiers, dying every day, it is a lose-lose proposition.
I certainly do not support it.

17 posted on 11/06/2005 5:38:29 PM PST by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson