To: Non-Sequitur
Darwinism cannot explain scientifically the origins of
life. It offers verifiable, empirical evidence for its theory only at a microbiological level for the origin of
species. At the macro level, it records observations that make it plausible.
It wil be defended tooth and nail but materialists needing it as a philosophical foundation, but there is growing erosion of its possibility as it has been taught and understood for a long time.
5 posted on
11/06/2005 6:42:46 AM PST by
TheGeezer
To: TheGeezer
Darwins TOE does not even attempt to explain the origins of life..
I am sure you know that full well, but continue to misrepresent TOE at every opportunity..
As for the TOE's erosion as an explanation of speciation, the evidence supporting it continues to grow..
The evidence that already exists is overwhelmingly supportive..
7 posted on
11/06/2005 7:03:09 AM PST by
Drammach
(Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
To: TheGeezer
but there is growing erosion of its possibility as it has been taught and understood for a long time.Only in the minds of the irrational.
Next the ID nuts will be attacking gravity: "we see no proof of gravity; our evidence suggests humans are kept in place by the hand of an invisible sky-god."
8 posted on
11/06/2005 7:08:45 AM PST by
Kjobs
To: TheGeezer
There is no erosion of support among people who understand it or who are willing to approach it with an open mind.
12 posted on
11/06/2005 7:26:12 AM PST by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
To: TheGeezer
Why is this restricted to bacteria and eucaryotic protists?
25 posted on
11/06/2005 8:06:10 AM PST by
furball4paws
(One of the last Evil Geniuses, or the first of their return.)
To: TheGeezer
Darwinism cannot explain scientifically the origins of life. And Intelligent Design does explain scientifically the origins of life?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson