[TheGeezer]

Darwinism cannot explain scientifically the origins of life. It offers verifiable, empirical evidence for its theory only at a microbiological level for the origin of species. At the macro level, it records observations that make it plausible.

It wil be defended tooth and nail but materialists needing it as a philosophical foundation, but there is growing erosion of its possibility as it has been taught and understood for a long time.

[Drammach]

Darwins TOE does not even attempt to explain the origins of life..
I am sure you know that full well, but continue to misrepresent TOE at every opportunity..

As for the TOE's erosion as an explanation of speciation, the evidence supporting it continues to grow..
The evidence that already exists is overwhelmingly supportive..

[Kjobs]

but there is growing erosion of its possibility as it has been taught and understood for a long time.

Only in the minds of the irrational.

Next the ID nuts will be attacking gravity: "we see no proof of gravity; our evidence suggests humans are kept in place by the hand of an invisible sky-god."

[muir_redwoods]

There is no erosion of support among people who understand it or who are willing to approach it with an open mind.

[furball4paws]

Why is this restricted to bacteria and eucaryotic protists?

[Non-Sequitur]

Darwinism cannot explain scientifically the origins of life.

And Intelligent Design does explain scientifically the origins of life?