Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kristinn
"As part of our reporting, we needed to verify that the chat room postings were authentic. We were authorized to view them, and it was appropriate to do so under the circumstances."

Of course, it's legal to view public chat room posts - but the Washington Post went way beyond that. The blithely admitted to violating the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act by accessing the private e-mail account of a person who identity is unknown to them. Soon, they'll be telling us that breaking and entering in pursuit of a story is protected under the First Amendment.

Mosk is in legal jeopardy - and if editor Brenner authorized Mosk to do it, he'd better get an attorney too.

170 posted on 11/05/2005 7:03:52 PM PST by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: HAL9000; kristinn; Congressman Billybob; All
The blithely admitted to violating the federal Electronic Communications Privacy Act by accessing the private e-mail account of a person who identity is unknown to them. Soon, they'll be telling us that breaking and entering in pursuit of a story is protected under the First Amendment.

Any one have a brief synopsis of what the FECPA contains?

172 posted on 11/05/2005 7:08:30 PM PST by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

To: HAL9000

I think Len Downie, Jr. needs an attorney, also. The initial story in February ran on the front page of The Post and had the potential of harming Gov. Ehrlich. No way he wouldn't be in the loop on this one.


182 posted on 11/05/2005 7:29:39 PM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson