Posted on 11/05/2005 3:23:55 PM PST by wagglebee
"It is their personal life ... it has no impact on what job they might be doing."
It sounds like they have BJ Klintoon working as their spokesman.
She later admitted that it does employ a disproportionate number of politicians.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie.Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
Wow, if Clinton had heard about this in the 90s, she'd have really been screwed. I guess it's just as well though, because collected from the likes of him would have resulted in the same thing again.
On the side, on the back, on the belly...
Hooking there is legal just as any other job.
It's the Sex Industry she's working in and paying taxes.
There also is a sex worker Union.
Can't fire anybody for pursuing a second job unless, but she's been evaluated as a good teacher.
OooKaaay. Sauce for the goose, sauce for the gander and all. No reprimand for the "client". Maybe there is morality in who is on top.
There was a German woman whose story we read a year or so back who was unemployed and was threatened with the loss of her unemployment benefits because she turned down a legal job as a sex worker. I wonder what became of that case.
As a teacher is she opposed to merit pay?
Beat me, whip me, make me divide by a minus one.
Exactly that what I thought. I wonder what happened to him / her??????
Any pictures LOL
I want the square root treatment
Yes, and, frankly speaking as an Australian teacher, I'd be opposed to any efforts to stop her working as a teacher.
I don't agree with her choice of lifestyle, or her choice or a second job, and I would weep no tears if prostitution was criminalised again.
But as it is, she is not doing anything illegal and her activities outside the classroom are her own business until they negatively impact her work.
There are schools here that would object to me as a teacher because I'm a member of the Liberal Party of Australia (which, remember is a conservative party despite its name). There are schools here that would object to me as a teacher because I served in the Australian Defence Force. There are schools here that would object to me as a teacher because I own and shoot firearms and I hunt.
But the law prevents them from holding my personal choices about how I live my life outside of school against me.
She's entitled to the same consideration. You can't just support rights when they protect the things you like.
Now - if she was teaching in a religious school, that'd be different. I think a Catholic school, for example, should have the right to dismiss a sex worker because their activities would be incompatible with the school.
But the same token, I would say a Quaker school - or any school founded on pacifism - would have the right to reject me as a veteran as being incompatible with their belief structure.
But when it comes to state schools - well, the law is what counts.
Mmmm....square root.
and whats that round the world geography quiz?
later pingout...
The teachers here in California are so bad that if she were here, I might even look the other way : )
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.