To: Arthur Wildfire! March
"...The press hasn't made much of Saddam's 500-ton uranium stockpile, downplaying the story to such an extent that most Americans aren't even aware of it. But it's been reported - albeit in a by-the-way fashion - by the New York Times and a handful of other media outlets..." Seems like I am seeing some in the MSM today finally reporting on the Wilson LIES. Am I dreaming? Someone wake me up; of course I don't think the WP or the NYT has yet taken this drastic step. Certainly my hometown paper the Arizona Repulsive hasn't.
37 posted on
11/05/2005 10:34:16 AM PST by
p23185
(Why isn't attempting to take down a sitting Pres & his Admin considered Sedition?)
To: p23185
"Am I dreaming?"
I've been sensing a shifting tone in the media, myself. A similar thing happened several years ago, when a blue stained dress was reported. They did rally back together a few weeks later, though. But when the truth is hurting them badly, they get pretty ticked off at whoever led them into that mess.
54 posted on
11/06/2005 5:56:32 AM PST by
Arthur Wildfire! March
("Every time the court veers left, the people are overwhelmingly opposed." [Laura Ingraham])
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson