Skip to comments.
Investigation Demanded Into Post's MD4Bush Report
The WBAL Channel ^
| 11/04/05
| WBAL-TV
Posted on 11/04/2005 4:25:15 PM PST by conservative in nyc
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
More at the link.
To: NCPAC; MD4Bush; xcullen; Anti-Bubba182; Mo1; cyncooper; BillF; crushkerry; Howlin; backhoe; ...
To: conservative in nyc
Why is the FR making an issue about this? Is the FR being accused of something?
3
posted on
11/04/2005 4:29:14 PM PST
by
Brilliant
To: conservative in nyc
... logged on as MD4Bush at least three times to verify private e-mails ...
How about that? Someone is paying attention. LOL
4
posted on
11/04/2005 4:30:37 PM PST
by
maggief
To: conservative in nyc
5
posted on
11/04/2005 4:31:17 PM PST
by
MonroeDNA
(Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
To: kristinn
You corrected framed the situation and phrased your description of the WaPost's behavior quite well.
Nice job.
6
posted on
11/04/2005 4:31:54 PM PST
by
Southack
(Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Brilliant
No, FR is neutral.
But I am not.
7
posted on
11/04/2005 4:32:49 PM PST
by
MonroeDNA
(Look for the union label--on the bat crashing through your windshield!)
To: conservative in nyc
BTTT... for truth... MD4BUSH liberal slug will be leave a slime trail straight to the belly of the beast IMHO...
8
posted on
11/04/2005 4:33:44 PM PST
by
LowOiL
("I am neither . I am a Christocrat" -Benjamin Rush)
To: Brilliant
9
posted on
11/04/2005 4:34:55 PM PST
by
maggief
To: conservative in nyc
YOu know what - the entire thing is getting very tiresome..........a DNC operative (ab)used posting privileges at FR and with the assistance of the DNC operatives working for the Washington Post cost the job of a staff member of Maryland Gov. Bob Ehrlich. It is that simple.
Even William Donald Schaeffer must be feeling a bit slimy right now
10
posted on
11/04/2005 4:36:19 PM PST
by
Gabz
To: maggief
So Matt Mosk is admitting that he was MD4Bush - on at least 3 occasions. Who is to say he wasn't the original poster as well? Unfortunately, I heard that MD has a shield law which protects "journalists" from being forced to identify their sources. It must serves a a license to lie.
Apparently, reporters can write their stories based on information from those they promise not to identify and there is nothing that can be done. What is there to keep reporters from fabricating, say, a 30 year-old military memo? They set it up in Microsoft Word and then the "age" it on a photocopier. Then they can keep secret the fact that they invented the story and the proof by stating that the information was given to them by a confidential informant.
Of course we know such a scenario is not likely (wink) but why leave open the option to cheat?
To: Gabz; Jim Robinson; kristinn
YOu know what - the entire thing is getting very tiresome..........a DNC operative (ab)used posting privileges at FR and with the assistance of the DNC operatives working for the Washington Post cost the job of a staff member of Maryland Gov. Bob Ehrlich. It is that simple.
The problem is you can't prove that without the IP logs. And Jim Robinson's not releasing them. Although (as far as I know) we've heard nothing from him or Kristinn today, I'm sure he has a very good reason and is probably thinking about the legal ramifications of and precedent it would set if he did so.
To: conservative in nyc; Stellar Dendrite; flashbunny
Freerepublic is still considered a "conservative" website? /sarc
13
posted on
11/04/2005 4:49:37 PM PST
by
DTogo
(I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
To: conservative in nyc
14
posted on
11/04/2005 4:50:28 PM PST
by
Deetes
(God Bless the Troops)
To: conservative in nyc
I am currently logged on as myself.
15
posted on
11/04/2005 4:50:34 PM PST
by
umgud
(Comment removed by poster before moderator could get to it)
To: conservative in nyc
The WaPo needs to ask the Feds for a special prosecutor to get to the bottom of this and see what other scams the WaPo has been party to.
16
posted on
11/04/2005 4:50:54 PM PST
by
Paladin2
(If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
To: Sgt_Schultze
The WaPost HQ is DC and printed in Virginia and Maryland, I believe. FR, of course, is CA.
What would be the jurisdiction?
17
posted on
11/04/2005 4:51:55 PM PST
by
maggief
To: Sgt_Schultze
If memory serves me, the WAPO once sued FR. Does anyone remember that?
18
posted on
11/04/2005 4:52:39 PM PST
by
basil
(Exercise your Second Amendment--buy another gun today!)
To: DTogo
"Freerepublic is still considered a "conservative" website? /sarc"
Nah, it's about equal parts former BushBots and former VRWC extreeeeeemists.
19
posted on
11/04/2005 4:53:16 PM PST
by
Paladin2
(If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
To: maggief
"What would be the jurisdiction? "
World Court?
20
posted on
11/04/2005 4:54:24 PM PST
by
Paladin2
(If the political indictment's from Fitz, the jury always acquits.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson