Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

If they invented a Time Machine, would they come back here?.......
1 posted on 11/04/2005 10:00:45 AM PST by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Red Badger

I want to go back and be nice to Bill Gates


66 posted on 11/04/2005 10:33:57 AM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Don't try and analyze this speculative garbage. Time is an illusion. It doesn't exist Freepers. The only reality is the present moment.
68 posted on 11/04/2005 10:37:15 AM PST by moasicwolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
SF author Larry Niven postulated "Niven's Law" which states if: 1) time travel is possible; and 2) you can change the past; then: 3) No time machine will ever be invented.

The proof is as follows: If you can change the past through the use of a time machine, then the state of the past will be in constant flux (first Kennedy is saved, then he's assassinated, then he's saved, etc. etc. etc.). As the past goes through constant revisions, eventually a past will be created in which no time machine is ever invented. At that point, the past will be fixed in place with no future revisions possible.

Thus, if it's possible to change the past through time travel, no time machine will ever be invented and thus you can't change the past. QED

72 posted on 11/04/2005 10:40:55 AM PST by PMCarey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Shouldn't this have been posted on the Friday Silliness thread?


75 posted on 11/04/2005 10:41:05 AM PST by Rose of Sharn (I get the best answers when I talk to myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

"Everything that can be invented has already been invented."

---Charles H. Duell, director of the US Patent Office, 1899


80 posted on 11/04/2005 10:48:04 AM PST by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Image hosted by Photobucket.com I'd want to go back to 1982.
81 posted on 11/04/2005 10:48:56 AM PST by observer821
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JenB

ninja llamas from the future?


82 posted on 11/04/2005 10:50:15 AM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nnn0jeh

ping


83 posted on 11/04/2005 10:53:18 AM PST by kalee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

One : do you have a CAMERA/REEL big enough to take a snapshot of the entire, inter-related UNIVERSE at any given instant? Two : How do you REVERSE on-going ENTROPY and roll the reel back to that earlier picture? Thus you confuse simple, reversible movies, with the on-going STORY of HIS-STORY.... Actually there is no such thing as "time". t=dKE=m=(W>P) or time is delta Kinetic Energy is mass(inertial or gravitational)is(matter)Wave energy greater than(fermion)Particle energy; ie, deceleration and gravity. I can explain it in more detail if you are interested... W=P


85 posted on 11/04/2005 10:56:06 AM PST by timer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Because this is the beginning of the information age and the dawn of the new discipline of biological engineering.

Plus this is the beginning of the Freedom Wars.

That's why I came back.


96 posted on 11/04/2005 11:17:10 AM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Probably just invented a clock.


99 posted on 11/04/2005 11:20:04 AM PST by DOGEY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
time machine? It's been done, just ask the British...


105 posted on 11/04/2005 11:36:34 AM PST by Celtic Conservative (Billy Tauzin about Louisiana: "half the state is under water, the other half is under indictment")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

106 posted on 11/04/2005 11:42:33 AM PST by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger

Didn't old Albert say that if you could travel fast enough energy would turn into mass? Wouldn't motion cease to exist?

Just wondering.


108 posted on 11/04/2005 11:55:48 AM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
There already is a time machine...step here, and you'll go back to: 1860, 1917, 1929, or 1967, depending upon whom you speak to:


Ribbon cutting at the Democrat National HQ
111 posted on 11/04/2005 12:10:51 PM PST by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
The corridor of time does exist, but such a tour is trillion times riskier than a cruise in a basin with holes about the Pacific

For years I have cursed the Chinese for their rotten package directions English translations.

Now I find out they've been outsourcing to the Ruskies all along.

112 posted on 11/04/2005 12:11:48 PM PST by ApplegateRanch (Mohamophages of the world, unite! "Offended by offended (any other type?) Muslims since 9-11")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

The (Indy) film "Primer" is awesome. Totally geeky but believable tale about some guys that invent a time machine in their garage and how it messes up their lives.

You can get it from Netflix, if you use that service. Can't remember where I first heard of it, but we've watched it twice and DH has passed it on to all of his nerdy engineering friends who do seem to be spending an awful lot of time in our garage these days. Hmmmm...

"An engineer builds a machine (quite by accident) that can transport the user back in time. But his discovery comes with an ominous caveat, because at the heart of this puzzling device, nothing is as it seems on the surface. The narrative inventively blends a patchwork story line with overlapping streams of dialogue that help build tension and suspense in this Sundance Film Festival Grand Jury Prize winner. David Sullivan and Shane Carruth star."


115 posted on 11/04/2005 1:00:51 PM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Modern science cannot give a definition of time.

See tag line...

116 posted on 11/04/2005 1:02:56 PM PST by bruin66 (Time: Nature's way of keeping everything from happening at once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
Modern science cannot give a definition of time.

Should say has not rather than cannot. However since time is an illusion, the definition, when it comes, will not be particularly useful.

118 posted on 11/04/2005 1:07:18 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Red Badger
The cause-effect relations are very stable, and all events happen in such a way that they cannot be changed.

>

McCoy: Shouldn't you be working on your time warp calculations, Mr Spock?

Spock: I am. (He resumes staring into space)

From Tomorrow is Yesterday

126 posted on 11/04/2005 4:16:13 PM PST by Dont_Tread_On_Me_888 (Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson