Michael would not want to be seen standing in the way of people trying to determine what really happened to Terri. Michael can't object to a little bit of investigation, if the investigators are trying to find out if his "beloved" Terri was harmed by other humans.
Michael and his cohorts insist he didn't do anything to Terri, so why not start there and ask if anyone might have harmed Terri?
I'm not saying Michael isn't involved. I'm saying that a few "outside of the box" questions might shake up the stalemate.
Nor would I, but this isn't investigation. It's making up stories without an ounce of evidence. This one -- the old "mystery intruder" story that we've all heard a dozen times from the likes of O.J. Simpson -- is painfully lame.
It's also preposterous on the face of it. We are to believe the Mystery Intruder took a healthy young woman out of bed without waking her husband, killed her silently out in the hall, and vanished before her husband -- awakened by the very sound of her fall -- rushed to her side?
Right. Try that one in court and hear the laughter.
You start your story from things Michael has said, but he's the suspect. He's not to be believed. He changed his account every time he testified about it. That is a liar at work.
Terri's own plan to feign sleep doesn't jive with her walking around near the bathroom and making a thud in the hall. Michael's words "a thud and it was Terri." Larry King Live transcript.
Remember that woman who wrote all those murder mysteries with the Inspector? She wrote a lot of novels that were made into movies.
I think you may be on to something syriacus.
Michael and his cohorts insist he didn't do anything to Terri, so why not start there and ask if anyone might have harmed Terri?
First - WHO are his cohorts? Where they in the apartment?
Second - if MS didn't even 'go there', someone entering apartment, why are you?