None at all. I only seek the truth. Sometimes it has to be obtained in an indirect manner.
That is admirable. Perhaps you could undertake a factual investigation to see if there is any truth in what you say before you say it?
I am also interested in the truth. That's why I'm defending the documented record in this case against baseless revisions.
>> ... Sometimes it has to be obtained in an indirect manner.
You have said several times, if I may put it so, that you propose to tell this pish-posh tale in order to trick a seasoned liar into telling the truth.
Let me know if it works.