Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
As obscure as this might seem, you have to remember that absent a male in the line these guys would have to back up to find a line that had a continual male line down to the present day.

Odds are the current claimant under those conditions is a fellow who was born and raised in Minneapolis, MN.

6 posted on 11/03/2005 7:58:56 PM PST by muawiyah (/ hey coach do I gotta' put in that "/sarcasm " thing again? How'bout a double sarcasm for this one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: muawiyah

A blue state, right?


10 posted on 11/03/2005 8:11:17 PM PST by aspidistra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: muawiyah
The French had the same rule when they were ruled by kings--the descent had to be entirely in the male line. When Charles X was forced to abdicate in 1830, and they didn't want to hand the throne to his young grandson, they went to the nearest cousin who went back entirely in the male line, and he became King Louis Philippe. (He was descended from the brother of Louis XIV.)

Shakespeare has a passage in Henry the Fifth, Act I, Scene II, where this rule is discussed:

"In terram Salicam mulieres ne succedant,"
"No woman shall succeed in Salique land"

13 posted on 11/03/2005 8:21:31 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson