Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pyro7480
One of the things I find insulting in that exchange is the assumption that all people who hold a prolife position look to the bible for the justification.

Personally, my objection to abortion is based strictly on biological facts and my respect for inherent human rights.

Biblical passages have no bearing whatsoever on my position.

99 posted on 11/04/2005 10:32:09 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dead
One of the things I find insulting in that exchange is the assumption that all people who hold a prolife position look to the bible for the justification.

Good point, dead; a very good point.

Personally, my objection to abortion is based strictly on biological facts and my respect for inherent human rights. Biblical passages have no bearing whatsoever on my position.

Not strictly Biblical per se, however, presumably those inherent human rights were endowed by a Creator, no?

104 posted on 11/04/2005 12:02:23 PM PST by AHerald ("Take heart; rise, he is calling you." Mark 10:49)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

To: dead

as science has progressed, it is more evident (without reverting to Biblical teaching, though such would lead to the same conclusions faster) that at least one human lifetime begins at conception ... if more than one develops, would that make it right to kill the earliest manifestation? God forbid, but (killing because of ambiguity) such is the nature of liberal thinking!


111 posted on 11/04/2005 8:58:26 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson