Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Group: Same-sex marriage bans hurt Latinos most
Houston Chronical ^ | 11/3/2005 | ROBERT CROWE

Posted on 11/03/2005 3:56:01 PM PST by thompsonsjkc

Group: Same-sex marriage bans hurt Latinos most

As Proposition 2 vote nears, group uses census data to raise issues that Hispanic gays face

By ROBERT CROWE

Limiting the rights of same-sex couples disproportionately harms Hispanic gays and lesbians because they are less likely than their white counterparts to be U.S. citizens and more likely to raise children and earn less, a national group said Tuesday.

The National Gay and Lesbian Task Force based its claims on a report that analyzed 2000 U.S. Census data. The report found constitutional bans on same-sex marriage — such as Proposition 2 on the Nov. 8 ballot — would hurt Hispanics more than whites.

"This is the richest, most complete data set on same-sex couples ... and it comes from our own government, and that's why it's so important," said Jason Cianciotto, author of the report and research director of the task force's Policy Institute.

Jonathan Saenz, staff attorney with the Plano-based Liberty Legal Institute and a Proposition 2 supporter, questions whether the task force truly cares about Hispanics or is merely using them to legalize gay marriage. "I don't want Hispanic people and statistics to be used as a pawn to advance someone's agenda," said Saenz.

The report found that Hispanic same-sex partners were raising children at more than three times the rate of white, non-Hispanic, same-sex couples.

White gay couples earn an average of $65,000 annually, while Hispanic same-sex couples earn less than $40,000. About 51 percent of gay couples where both partners are Hispanic were identified as not being U.S. citizens, the report says. For couples comprising Hispanic and white men, 8 percent were not U.S. citizens.

If gay marriage were legal in Texas, Christopher Rigdon said he would be able to sponsor his Colombian-born partner, Sergio Sarmiento, for U.S. citizenship. "We talk about equality as a strong American ideal ... but we do not extend it to gay and lesbian citizens," Rigdon, 33, a Houston-area teacher, said.

Sarmiento and Rigdon are among 5,000 same-sex Hispanic couples in Texas identified in the report.

"This makes me wonder whether the report's motivation is to change immigration laws instead of solidifying loving relationships," Saenz said.

Of the approximately 600,000 same-sex couple households, 105,025 were identified as Hispanic, the report says. The Census allows people to identify whether they are part of a same-sex couple living in the same house.

Cianciotto said the actual number of same-sex households is probably 50 percent more than those reported.

"For people like me, this document does not come as a surprise," said Lorenzo Herrera y Lozano, an Austin-based board member of National Latino/a Coalition for Justice.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: gaymarriage; hardesthit; hispanics; homosexual; homosexualagenda; samesexmarriage
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: thompsonsjkc
It continues to amaze me..

how 2-3% of the population garners so much ink/discussion.

21 posted on 11/03/2005 4:22:09 PM PST by TheOracleAtLilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TenaciousZ

Not to mention Prop. 2 is about Texas only.


22 posted on 11/03/2005 4:22:14 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thompsonsjkc

THAT is a load of crap - The majority of those coming from Mexico and Central America are extremely moral and hard working -- you know -- just like our forefathers were.

It is the welfare slaves that are the real threat to America -- they and their Masters-in-black-robes under the racist DNC


23 posted on 11/03/2005 4:25:11 PM PST by soltice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thompsonsjkc
If gay marriage were legal in Texas, Christopher Rigdon said he would be able to sponsor his Colombian-born partner, Sergio Sarmiento, for U.S. citizenship.

Oh, great. That's all we need!

24 posted on 11/03/2005 4:26:05 PM PST by BlessedBeGod (Benedict XVI = Terminator IV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thompsonsjkc

Ackk - will ping out later, tnx - gotta run, busy til later tonight.

It's called "clutching at straws".


25 posted on 11/03/2005 4:28:46 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thompsonsjkc

Officer Ponch nails it again... ;-)

26 posted on 11/03/2005 4:31:01 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (*Fightin' the system like a $2 hooker on crack*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

Oh, that's just wrong, seeing as how Ponch is a Latino.


27 posted on 11/03/2005 4:32:29 PM PST by thompsonsjkc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead

Yup, lotsa numbers being flung about. And then of course you've got the report's author himself asserting that the "actual number of same-sex households is probably 50 percent more than those reported." Who needs facts?


28 posted on 11/03/2005 4:32:37 PM PST by TenaciousZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

So it is now racist to support traditional marriage?

Yes that is the general idea.


29 posted on 11/03/2005 4:34:42 PM PST by rbg81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thompsonsjkc
By saying this: "Group: Same-sex marriage bans hurt Latinos most" are they inferring that Latinos are Gay?

That's contrary to Machismo.

30 posted on 11/03/2005 4:35:28 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak
Very misleading headline. It should read "HOMOSEXUAL Latinos hurt the most".

Very typical of the liberal obfuscation we have come to expect from the Houston Chronicle.

The Houston Chronicle is sometimes mistakenly assumed to lean towards conservatism by people outside of Texas because of the home town where it's published. Don't be fooled by that. The staff and managing editors of the Houston Chronicle are leftists of the first order who rarely represent the majority opinion of Houston area residents and never represent fairly the opinion of conservatives.

I can assure you that a large majority of Houston area residents, especially Hispanics, will vote for the proposition banning same-sex marriage in Texas.

31 posted on 11/03/2005 4:38:38 PM PST by Unmarked Package
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SandRat; All

Infering all "latino" men are homosexuals is the exact intent of the article.

or as the reporter says "We are reporting 50000000000000 million latinos are homosexuals, we have no evident to support this but right now we are reporting 5000000000000000000000000000000000 million latinos are homosexuals. In case you just joined us, we are reporting 5000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 milion latinos are homosexuals."


32 posted on 11/03/2005 4:39:30 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

ah,.... using the Calypso Louie Million-Man-Math I see


33 posted on 11/03/2005 4:42:02 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SandRat

(s)Latino group, all latinos are homosexuals now, Calypso Louie is a supporter of homosexual rights since he had a billion MAN march and only MEN were invited.(/s)


34 posted on 11/03/2005 4:49:46 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TenaciousZ

This sounds like an alarmingly high number, but consider that there are 60 million coupled households in the US, so only 1% of coupled households are homosexual. About what you would expect for under 2% of the population.


35 posted on 11/03/2005 4:50:07 PM PST by CGTRWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: thompsonsjkc

Well, Mr. Estrada is Latino. Ponch was supposedly to be an Italian. Que sera sera...


36 posted on 11/03/2005 4:52:16 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (*Fightin' the system like a $2 hooker on crack*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CGTRWK

You realize that include ANY household with a homosexual present. Thus if a homosexual man or woman lives with their normal mother or father, that household is labled as homosexual.

The reverse is not true.

Just a racist use the one drop rule. The homosexuals use the one homo rule.


37 posted on 11/03/2005 4:53:25 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

the homosexuals are trying that with Canadian homosexual marriages. The Immigration Department is refusing based on the 1996 DMA. IOW the immigration service is saying they would if they did not have the pesky DMA. So the homosexuals are currently in Federal court suing for spousal visas.

Right now a illegal alien woman can "buy" a marriage from a homosexual man living in south beach for about 5,000 dollars US. Imagine the pretext marriage industry with homosexual marriage based visas. The immigration service can detect them now, (iow they are incompetent to detect them but in "stuck on stupid" perpetrator cases)there is no way for them to detect them solely based on homosexuals sex behavior.


38 posted on 11/03/2005 5:05:33 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

This is the second article supporting from this ird age liner supporting sodomite marriage.


39 posted on 11/03/2005 5:19:57 PM PST by TXBSAFH ("I would rather be a free man in my grave then living as a puppet or a slave." - Jimmy Cliff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Unmarked Package

"I can assure you that a large majority of Houston area residents, especially Hispanics, will vote for the proposition banning same-sex marriage in Texas."

According to a LA Times exit poll, Hispanics voted for California's ban at a higher percentage than Blacks or Whites.

Even though the radical separationist types like aztlan picked John Kerry as best for their concerns, their articles indicate that they are very conservative on the issue of gays. They even opposed the Supreme Court ruling on sodomy:

'US Supreme Court's decision on "sodomy" will worsen the AIDS epidemic'
http://www.aztlan.net/supremecourtsodomy.htm

'Sodomites force the closure of 65 Catholic parishes in Boston'
http://www.aztlan.net/65_parishes_close.htm


40 posted on 11/03/2005 9:08:12 PM PST by Susannah (http://www.tellthechildrenthetruth.com http://www.revisionisthistory.org IS REVISIONIST HISTORY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson