Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mass. bill endangers OpenDocument decision
CNET News.com ^ | November 3, 2005, 7:54 AM PST | Martin LaMonica

Posted on 11/03/2005 1:38:34 PM PST by Bush2000

Mass. bill endangers OpenDocument decision
By Martin LaMonica
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
Published: November 3, 2005, 7:54 AM PST

The Massachusetts Senate has introduced a provision to an economic stimulus bill that endangers a state decision to standardize on the OpenDocument format.

An amendment to Senate bill 2256, published on Wednesday, proposes the creation of a four-person information technology task force to approve technical standards in the state. The Senate is scheduled on Thursday to discuss the bill, known as the Commonwealth Investment Act.

The introduction of the amendment follows a hearing on Monday during which the chair of a state Senate watchdog committee, Marc Pacheco, criticized a decision by the IT Division of Massachusetts to standardize on OpenDocument, a document format for desktop productivity applications.


In a closely watched move, the IT Division of Massachusetts finalized a policy last month that mandates that products used by agencies in the executive branch comply with the OpenDocument standard, which is also called the Open Document Format for Office Applications, or ODF.

By using the OpenDocument standard, the IT Division said that state documents will be readable hundreds of years from now. The chief information officer, Peter Quinn, also said that a move to OpenDocument-based products will save the state money.

Sun Microsystems' StarOffice suite complies with the OpenDocument format and many other companies, including IBM, Novell, Adobe and smaller firms, have voiced their interest in the format. Microsoft, by contrast, said it does not intend to support OpenDocument natively in its dominant Office suite.

At the hearing on Monday, Pacheco criticized the process behind IT Division's decision. He questioned the division's authority to set state policy on technical standards.

Also at the hearing, the state supervisor of public records, Alan Cote, condemned the move, claiming it could result in lost electronic records.

The general counsel of the IT Division, Linda Hamel, argued at the Monday hearing that the division has authority to set standards and that the CIO's office has sought to work with other state agencies to set its overall policies.

Some observers said that the IT Division's decision has caused a stir in part because of Massachusetts politics. One government official on Monday said there is a turf war over electronic records between the IT Division, which reports to the Secretary of Administration and Finance, and the public records office, which reports to the Secretary of the Commonwealth.

The bill, if adopted, would impose an added approval step to state policy decisions.

"An executive agency or department shall not adopt or implement a policy, practice or standard concerning information technology standards or systems or the procurement or use of hardware, software, and cellular phones and other electronic devices, without the affirmative approval of the task force by majority vote," the bill states.

The four task force members would be appointed by the governor and at least two of them will be representatives from the business community.


TOPICS: Technical
KEYWORDS: greasypalms; incompetentidiots; odf; taxachusetts

1 posted on 11/03/2005 1:38:34 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Some observers said that the IT Division's decision has caused a stir in part because of Massachusetts politics. One government official on Monday said there is a turf war over electronic records between the IT Division, which reports to the Secretary of Administration and Finance, and the public records office, which reports to the Secretary of the Commonwealth.

Interesting observation. This may have less to do with ODF versus DOC and more to do with which bureaucracy can lay claim to the storage standard...
2 posted on 11/03/2005 1:40:34 PM PST by Bush2000 (Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...

3 posted on 11/03/2005 1:41:41 PM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FrogBurger

ping


4 posted on 11/03/2005 1:45:50 PM PST by conservatrice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000

Microsoft found two Democrat state officials they could bribe. Congratulations.


5 posted on 11/03/2005 1:50:05 PM PST by HAL9000 (Get a Mac - The Ultimate FReeping Machine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000

Wow, I wonder how much that cost Microsoft.


6 posted on 11/03/2005 1:51:38 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000; antiRepublicrat

Proof?


7 posted on 11/03/2005 2:39:45 PM PST by Bush2000 (Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000

I doubt it, myself. Pissing battles between bureaucrats usually don't need piles of cash to get them going. Promises of a corner office with a better view and a hot secretary is usually sufficient.


8 posted on 11/03/2005 3:06:34 PM PST by chronic_loser (Handle provided free of charge as flame bait for the neurally vacant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: chronic_loser
Promises of a corner office with a better view and a hot secretary is usually sufficient.

I could use one, myself. ;-p


9 posted on 11/03/2005 4:00:23 PM PST by Bush2000 (Linux -- You Get What You Pay For ... (tm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Oh, C'mon now... she'd probably hurt you. :-)

In any event, this is interesting. We'll see how it plays out, especially since most people in the MA government probably cannot even spell computer.

10 posted on 11/03/2005 5:13:19 PM PST by ken in texas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Proof?

No proof. It's how we know government works, plus Microsoft saying it was twisting the arms of people not officially involved in the process, but who suddenly now want to stick their noses into it. However, in my search, I did find his donations to Kennedy, Hillary and Kerry. Your kinda guy.

11 posted on 11/04/2005 8:14:56 AM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson