Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB
But the situation is more critical than it was the Shah's day.

And your point is?

53 posted on 11/03/2005 7:48:52 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: rhombus

"And your point is?"

That in 1979 that the maximum downside was the loss of our "ally" and taking over the U.S. embassy. Khomeni decimated what was left of the Shah's army.

Today we are in a shooting war and Saudi Arabia and Pakistan would have a lot to give to the other side. Pakistan even has nuclear technology while the Saudis have American technology and training.

So I think simplistic judgments in either direction are dangerous - we can't just say "they are out allies and it doesn't matter what they do internally" nor can we just say "they are dictators with poor human rights records so we have to abandon them."

But complex views and nuanced approaches tend to just get whomever suggests them attacked by both extremes who want simple solutions.


62 posted on 11/03/2005 7:59:21 AM PST by gondramB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson