Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists See Light that May Be from First Objects in Universe
NASA ^ | November 2, 2005

Posted on 11/03/2005 3:50:05 AM PST by Mike Fieschko

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: Recon Dad
You have failed to answer the question what came before.

I asked YOU why you think that something had to be there before.

Something does not come from nothing.

Respected men of learning used to have the same conviction about the shape of the earth, the orbits of planets, and that man could never fly.
Shouldn't you say, something does not comes from nothing....unless God is involved. Your closed mindness is showing just a bit.
41 posted on 11/03/2005 6:12:40 AM PST by newcats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad
... to answer the question (of) what came before.

A quick clarification. There is no "before". Not only space and matter, but time itself sprang forth from the hand of God at the creation. There can be no concept of time where there is no dimension or substance.

And at the ending of creation there will - again - be no more time. There will be ... something else.

42 posted on 11/03/2005 6:30:42 AM PST by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
And at the ending of creation there will - again - be no more time. There will be ... something else.

Overtime?

43 posted on 11/03/2005 6:31:48 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
Thanks for the ping!

IMO, (to parapharse General Honore), those of you who are stuck on "I'm the most important creature in the Universe, therefore God's 'day' must equal my (earthly) day" should spend a few hours reviewing the APOD archives -- before you refer to thoughtful Christians and millions of scientists as "unwise"...

Of a truth, correspondents ought to remember the relativistic nature of time when speaking of the age of the universe.
44 posted on 11/03/2005 6:32:27 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Of a truth, correspondents ought to remember the relativistic nature of time when speaking of the age of the universe.

So, if the universe is expanding, then time might be doing the same, and seven days 13.7 billion years ago was not the same as seven days now. It actually compressed more events into less observable time. Factor in the relativistic changes of time as a commodity traveling at near the speed of light as it spreads through the void, along with the universe, and you've got some serious, mind-bending computations going on.

45 posted on 11/03/2005 6:36:36 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA; Recon Dad; betty boop
Thank you so much for the ping to this sidebar!

Indeed, something came from nothing - that is what the fact of a beginning has shown. As Jastrow observed, the fact of a beginning of space/time (geometry) is the most theological statement to ever come out of science.

Every cosmological model of an infinite past has failed. All cosmologies (big bang, multi-verse, multi-world, Level IV, ekpyrotic, cyclic, hesitating, chaotic inflation, imaginary time, etc.) - all of them - require a beginning because they all rely on geometry and causality.

In the void in which there was a beginning there is no space, no time, no energy, no matter, no physical laws, no physical constants, no mathematical structures, no geometry, no physical causality.

Again, I assert there is no physical causality in the void.

Thus a beginning requires an uncaused cause, a prime mover, a "great Geometer" - the only possible candidate for such being God Himself.

46 posted on 11/03/2005 6:59:03 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407
Thank you for your reply!

Time is geometric - a fact that many people cannot seem to fathom as they insist that physical reality consists of three spatial dimensions evolving over time.

But in special relativity, we see space/time as a hypercube of 4 dimensions (x, y, z and t for time). General relativity is similar except that space/time itself is warped.

Massive objects with high positive gravity form indentations of space/time from which an object can only escape by achieving a certain velocity. Even light bends under the influence of the indentations and in black holes, light cannot escape.

The Equivalence Principle shows that inertial mass equals gravitational mass (roughly, all objects fall with the same acceleration). Thus, if one were in the vicinity of a black hole for a week, 40 years might elapse on earth. Likewise, if you traveled through space at the speed of one earth’s gravity, in 25.3 years of your voyage, 5x1010 years would elapse on earth.

For more on the subject:

Scripture/Physics point-of-view

Special Relativity


47 posted on 11/03/2005 7:13:12 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Likewise, if you traveled through space at the speed of one earth’s gravity, in 25.3 years of your voyage, 5x1010 years would elapse on earth.

Actually, gravity is more of a constant acceleration than a speed (32 feet per second per second), so at that acceleration you'd eventually reach relativistic speeds. I don't have the chops to figure that one out quickly, though.

48 posted on 11/03/2005 7:18:23 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (The best stuff happens just before the thread snaps.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra
A quick clarification. There is no "before". Not only space and matter, but time itself sprang forth from the hand of God at the creation.

I'm really not picking nits here but...

G-d Spoke the universe into existance. He uttered the Word, and the universe sprang forth.

I've always thought the idea was rather beautiful. There is power in words. Someday, I hope to be able to ask what the Word was.

49 posted on 11/03/2005 7:21:55 AM PST by zeugma (Warning: Self-referential object does not reference itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407
Thank you for your reply!

The second link which is an animated explanation of special relativity from the postulates forward, steps through the specific calculation at the page titled: "the spacetime wheel"

50 posted on 11/03/2005 7:22:59 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
Nicely said Alamo-Girl.
51 posted on 11/03/2005 7:23:29 AM PST by zeugma (Warning: Self-referential object does not reference itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Thank you so much for your encouragement!


52 posted on 11/03/2005 7:25:02 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

Simply, amen.


53 posted on 11/03/2005 8:51:01 AM PST by Recon Dad ( Now Force Recon Dad (and proud of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: agere_contra

This is my point. There has to be something.


54 posted on 11/03/2005 8:52:23 AM PST by Recon Dad ( Now Force Recon Dad (and proud of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Recon Dad

Thank you so much for your amen!!!


55 posted on 11/03/2005 8:52:54 AM PST by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener
I may be wrong, but I think this article says: "We took a picture of the sky, and used PhotoShop to remove everything until we got to what we thought was what we wanted."

Photoshop is an excellent tool for astronomical imaging and processing of low light, deep space objects, and can remove unwanted imaging artifacts, while enhancing other objects in the images.

56 posted on 11/03/2005 9:06:45 AM PST by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mike Fieschko
Thanks for the link to the story. I'd read that some time ago and forgotten it.
57 posted on 11/03/2005 9:27:19 AM PST by zeugma (Warning: Self-referential object does not reference itself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: newcats

Hawkings actually goes much deeper than that, although his thoughts begin with the mass-energy equivilence and quantum "changes" between different indeterminate states of mass.

Basically, he theorizes that, at the center of a black hole, mass - being equal to energy, can "leave" the black hole.


58 posted on 11/03/2005 9:46:20 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (-I contribute to FR monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS supports Hillary's Secular Sexual Socialism every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Black Tooth
I've got problems with a theory that begins by assuming 90% of matter can't be found, nor can it even be discovered, "merely" because the math says it must be there because the "Math" is more beautiful and simplistic and elegant when physicists can assume that the "dark matter" exists.

Further, I've got a problem with a theory that can't explain why the current matter-anti-matter ratio is so uneven by so many thousand times.
59 posted on 11/03/2005 9:49:42 AM PST by Robert A Cook PE (-I contribute to FR monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS supports Hillary's Secular Sexual Socialism every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl; betty boop
[ Of a truth, correspondents ought to remember the relativistic nature of time when speaking of the age of the universe. ]

Interesting how in a dream a simple "plot" can take all night to proceed.. and a complex "plot"(in a dream) can proceed during a brief nap.. its like time is not very important in a human dream.. like in a human dream... time is relative..

Ever notice that in you're dreams.?... I have in mine.. maybe human dreams are getting "us" ready for something.. so it will not seem strange to us when that something happens.. Since "we" experienced "relative time" all our lives..

60 posted on 11/03/2005 9:51:59 AM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson