Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Online Freedom of Speech Fails in House
Powerline ^ | 11/02/2005 | John Hinderaker

Posted on 11/02/2005 6:44:50 PM PST by tsmith130

Apparently the Online Freedom of Speech Act failed to pass in the House of Representatives tonight. I infer this from a statement we got a few minutes ago from Minnesota Congressman Mark Kennedy, a leading proponent of free speech, including free speech on the web. Mark writes:

I'm horribly disappointed that this important measure failed to pass. This bill was designed to protect the free speech rights of Americans whose only alleged crime is wanting to use the Internet to express their opinions.

I disagree with the mainstream media elites who seem to think that an unregulated media is dangerous, unless it is them who are being regulated. What is disturbing and dangerous to me, and to the constituents I represent, is the ease with which so many advocate government regulation of speech.

Bloggers are everyday citizens. They are our neighbors, friends, and coworkers who want to be able to share their ideas without asking permission from a gatekeeper in the mainstream media and certainly not from a government official. They are the historical descendants of Founding Fathers like Thomas Paine and other pamphleteers who contributed enormously to our democracy.

We are trying to spread a message of hope, opportunity, and freedom around the world. I supported this legislation so that we don't lose the ability to have that message shared among the American people, and I am frankly disappointed that a majority of Members don't see it that way.

Mark Kennedy is staking out a position as one of the leading advocates of free speech in America today. What is happening here is that certain people--the editorial board of the New York Times, the Democrats on the Federal Election Commission--are trying to put sites like this one out of business. Frankly, I haven't followed the progress of the Online Freedom of Speech Act closely because I thought the idea that the FEC would try to shut down political discussion on the web was ridiculous. It appears that we have to take the threat to our First Amendment rights more seriously.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 109th; hindraker; weblogs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

1 posted on 11/02/2005 6:44:51 PM PST by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
True free speech is the archenemy of those who voted against it.
2 posted on 11/02/2005 6:46:06 PM PST by xcamel (No more RINOS - Not Now, Not Ever Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130

Uh Oh! Something tells me Im going to be in trouble.


3 posted on 11/02/2005 6:46:35 PM PST by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
I think we need the roll call put up so we can yell at the appropriate people. Loudly.
4 posted on 11/02/2005 6:46:52 PM PST by kingu (Draft Fmr Senator Fred Thompson for '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DogBarkTree

Maybe you'll be grandfathered in. ;o)


5 posted on 11/02/2005 6:47:22 PM PST by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: tsmith130
How about we get McCain-Feingold repealed first, then worry about additional legislation, hah?
7 posted on 11/02/2005 6:48:46 PM PST by Prime Choice (I can open hearts and minds effortlessly. I have a hacksaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel
I'm confused about why online speech isn't already covered by the First Amendment.

But then again I'm still confused about how the McCain-Feingold denial of free speech law got passed.

8 posted on 11/02/2005 6:49:21 PM PST by CaptRon (Pedecaris alive or Raisuli dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
Simple solution to this mess: house the servers offshore.

It's a sad state of affairs when we have to move our venues OUT of America to be able to speak freely.

9 posted on 11/02/2005 6:50:43 PM PST by Prime Choice (I can open hearts and minds effortlessly. I have a hacksaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon

McCain-Feingold getting passed is easy to explain. How it passed Constitutional muster in the Supreme Court is the confusing part.


10 posted on 11/02/2005 6:51:18 PM PST by Tatze (I voted for John Kerry before I voted against him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CaptRon
I'm confused about why online speech isn't already covered by the First Amendment.

Thank the Leftists and RINOs. They gleefully signed our rights away in the name of "reform."

Now only foreign billionaires really have freedom of speech in OUR nation!

11 posted on 11/02/2005 6:51:39 PM PST by Prime Choice (I can open hearts and minds effortlessly. I have a hacksaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130

Checking in... and getting ready to fight for freedom of speech.


12 posted on 11/02/2005 6:52:12 PM PST by dandelion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Baynative
182 people, of whom, I hope none represent me directly, that should feel the brunt of the outrage over this.

The sad part is that it had to go under the no debate, no amendment rule because of the number of idjits in congress who think that every good bill needs to be destroyed with nonsense amendments.
13 posted on 11/02/2005 6:53:16 PM PST by kingu (Draft Fmr Senator Fred Thompson for '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tsmith130
Mark Kennedy definitely seems to be somebody deserving of support in his run to become the next Senator from Minnesota.

Just thought I'd express my opinion.... while I still can.

14 posted on 11/02/2005 6:55:38 PM PST by Wissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dandelion
Checking in... and getting ready to fight for freedom of speech.

Getting ready? The war started with the passage of McCain-Feingold. We've been losing ground ever since.

15 posted on 11/02/2005 6:57:30 PM PST by Prime Choice (I can open hearts and minds effortlessly. I have a hacksaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kingu

Somebody pull the roll call to see who voted how????


16 posted on 11/02/2005 6:57:39 PM PST by xcamel (No more RINOS - Not Now, Not Ever Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tatze
How it passed Constitutional muster in the Supreme Court is the confusing part.

*cough* Souter *cough* Ginsburg *cough* O'Connor

17 posted on 11/02/2005 6:58:08 PM PST by Prime Choice (I can open hearts and minds effortlessly. I have a hacksaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kingu
Here is the list of folks who voted against. Italics identify Democrats, regular are Republicans, all have some explaining to do, IMHO.
Abercrombie
Allen
Andrews
Baird
Baldwin
Bass
Bean
Becerra
Berkley
Berry
Bishop (NY)
Boehlert
Boyd
Bradley (NH)
Brown, Corrine
Butterfield
Capps
Cardin
Carnahan
Carson
Case
Castle
Cleaver
Clyburn
Coble
Cooper
Costello
Crowley
Cummings
Davis (AL)
Davis (CA)
Davis (FL)
Davis (IL)
DeFazio
DeGette
Delahunt
DeLauro
Dicks
Dingell
Doggett
Doyle
Edwards
Emanuel
Emerson
Engel
Evans
Farr
Filner
Ford
Frank (MA)
Frelinghuysen
Gallegly
Gilchrest
Gillmor
Gonzalez
Gordon
Green, Al
Green, Gene
Grijalva
Gutierrez
Hefley
Higgins
Hinchey
Hinojosa
Hobson
Holden
Holt
Hooley
Inslee
Israel
Jackson (IL)
Jackson-Lee (TX)
Jefferson
Johnson (CT)
Johnson (IL)
Johnson, E. B.
Jones (OH)
Kanjorski
Kaptur
Kildee
Kilpatrick (MI)
Kirk
Kucinich
LaHood
Langevin
Lantos
Larsen (WA)
Larson (CT)
LaTourette
Leach
Levin
Lewis (GA)
Lipinski
LoBiondo
Lowey
Lynch
Maloney
Markey
Matsui
McCarthy
McDermott
McGovern
McIntyre
McNulty
Meehan
Meek (FL)
Meeks (NY)
Michaud
Millender-McDonald
Miller (NC)
Miller, George
Mollohan
Moore (KS)
Moore (WI)
Moran (VA)
Nadler
Napolitano
Neal (MA)
Oberstar
Obey
Olver
Ortiz
Osborne
Owens
Pallone
Pascrell
Pastor
Payne
Pelosi
Petri
Platts
Pomeroy
Price (NC)
Ramstad
Rangel
Regula
Rothman
Ruppersberger
Rush
Sánchez, Linda T.
Sanders
Saxton
Schakowsky
Schiff
Schmidt
Schwartz (PA)
Schwarz (MI)
Scott (VA)
Shays
Sherman
Simmons
Skelton
Slaughter
Smith (NJ)
Snyder
Solis
Spratt
Stupak
Tanner
Tauscher
Taylor (MS)
Thompson (MS)
Tierney
Towns
Turner
Udall (NM)
Upton
Van Hollen
Velázquez
Visclosky
Walden (OR)
Walsh
Wamp
Wasserman Schultz
Watt
Waxman
Weiner
Weldon (PA)
Wexler
Wilson (NM)
Wolf
Wu

18 posted on 11/02/2005 6:59:21 PM PST by kingu (Draft Fmr Senator Fred Thompson for '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

Here's who voted against.


19 posted on 11/02/2005 6:59:56 PM PST by kingu (Draft Fmr Senator Fred Thompson for '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice

*cough* bush....

he can't escape blame, especially after he said he would veto it when he was campaigning.


20 posted on 11/02/2005 7:00:38 PM PST by flashbunny (Anybody want to trade Alito back in for Miers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson