Replies

Why would the Post publically declare (now) that Mosk had sign-in information in late January when the 2/08 public posts contained the evidence that would implicate Steffen?

Because many people, including the MD Senate Majority Leader, Congressman Billybob in a Newsbusters.org article, and numerous FReepers have been suggesting that MD4Bush is or acted in concert with Matthew Mosk of the Washington Post. They needed to try to defend their actions. Which happened to show MD4Bush was violating his or her FR user agreement. Which opened the door for tomorrow's press conference.

Also, I think it's reasonable to assume that given the Post's admission that Mosk had sign-in information for MD4Bush from an intermediary (possibly Damian O'Doherty, esq.) that the 2/08 posts were made by Matthew Mosk of the Washington Post to support his story that was published shortly after.

I seem to recall that some FReeper suggested the FReepmails were dumped on the threads so that the Washington Post could avoid legal liability for publishing private FReepmails. I can't find the post, don't remember which FReeper posted it and don't know whether the theory is true.

Furthermore, I believe Mosk took over corresponding with Steffen in Freepmail in an attempt to gain an admission by Steffen that he was firing at-will employees which would empower Maryland Democrat Legislators to investigate the Ehrlich administration.

Well, I guess we might find this out tomorrow. Only Mosk, NCPAC, MD4Bush and Jim Robinson would know.

Here's the latest synopsis:

MD4Bush Synopsis:

MD4Bush was a poster on Freerepublic from 10/07/04 to 02/09/05 who was a seldom participant on the forum but when he did contribute it was usually in discussing Maryland politics with several comments about rumors of Democrat Baltimore Mayor Martin O’Malley. He had exchanges with NCPAC (now known as former Maryland Governor Ehrlich staffer Joe Steffen) where the subject of O’Malley’s alleged infidelities and the alleged tactics of Karl Rove. On 02/09/05 MD4Bush posted private Freepmails on the open forum between himself and Steffen showing only Steffen’s opinion on the O’Malley rumors with key comments underlined but not MD4Bush’s side of the conversation.

The next morning the Washington Post ran a story entitled Ehrlich Aide Ousted Over O'Malley Rumors which detailed the underlined Freepmail content posted on the open forum and named Steffen. In addition, the reporter, Matthew Mosk, had interviewed the O’Malley camp about the rumors and reported that Ehrlich had accepted Steffen’s resignation. A few months later the Maryland General Assembly formed a Personnel Committee to investigate the alleged unfair firing practices of at-will employees by the Ehrlich administration based on the “dirty tricks” methods of Steffen. When the committee was convened Ehrlich attorney Jervis Finney suggested it look in to the postings of MD4Bush to balance their view on Steffen but he and Maryland Republicans were rebuffed when the committee decided not to grant subpoena power to committee Republicans.

In recent days WBAL radio in Baltimore reported that MD4Bush may be Ryan O’Doherty due to his name being signed on a letter written on 02/09/05 attached to a letter from Finney to the Personnel Committee. Below is the content of the letter:

There will be a big story in the Post either tomorrow or Thursday that credits Gov. Ehrlich's staff for creating and spreading the nasty and untrue rumor about our Mayor and his family," the e-mail reads. It goes on to mention a top O'Malley aide who "asked me to contact you to see if you could show your disgust by calling into WBAL Radio after the story hits ... it is top secret!
There:
“I voted for Ehrlich because I thought he would get rid of the culture of corruption and assassin politics of Annapolis -- he has only made it worse. He should be ashamed of the dirty smear campaign perpetuated by his own staff. It disgusts me to know that my tax dollars paid for this filth.”
This will be the biggest story of the year. Thanks for your help.

Ryan O’Doherty responded to the letter:

Through news outlets over the course of several months, I have learned of the content of this alleged e-mail, and I can say without a doubt that I did not write it. In fact, I did not work for the Democratic Party at the time the e-mail was allegedly sent and I'm even told that my e-mail address shown on the document is incorrect. I'm disappointed someone is circulating a document without bothering to verify its authenticity.

However, another question is still lingering. On 02/11/05 Freerepublic owner Jim Robinson wrote:

I've got some very interesting information for the governor's investigation regarding the Maryland Democrat Party dirty trickster that setup Steffen and the Washington Post ~~reporter~~ er, Democrat operative that was working in concert with him. Almost hoping to receive a subpoena.

Which begs the question: Who was the Washington Post reporter that colluded with MD4Bush? The Washington Post responded through Maryland editor R.B. Brenner in a 11/02/05 article:

Brenner said, "The Washington Post had no involvement in any way in the chat room postings" between Steffen and MD4BUSH. "The Post did not know about them until after they had already occurred, as we have reported."
Brenner said The Post does not know the identity of MD4BUSH, which the newspaper also has reported.
Post reporter Matthew Mosk received printed copies of the message exchanges last fall, Brenner said. To verify they were authentic, he said, Mosk was given sign-on information needed to view the private chat room by an intermediary acting on behalf of MD4BUSH in late January. Mosk used that information to verify that "the chat room messages were genuine," Brenner said. Mosk presented the printouts to Steffen in February to confirm that they represented his words.

The Post’s piece raises more questions than it answers. Did Matthew Mosk collude with MD4Bush to “get” the Ehrlich administration and set up events that provided Maryland Democrats with the ammo they needed to seat a Committee that would burden the Governor during an election year? Furthermore, is former Maryland Democrat Party Communications Director Ryan O’Doherty MD4Bush? Is the "intermediary" his brother Damian O’Doherty esq., chief advisor for Democrat Baltimore County executive Jim Smith? And who is the “Steve” in the “BIG Story” letter? Is it Steve Jost of the Maryland Democrat Party or is it Steve Kearney, Communications Director for Democrat Mayor Martin O’Malley?